wrote:

analogdial wrote: "John Kasupski wrote:

Now, sadlly, there is instead a bunch of nitwits who seem to think someone may
have somehow gotten hold of five cruise missiles and plans to launch one at each
antenna site for the five WWV transmitters (one for each frequency) using the
coordinates given in the newsgroup as targeting data. Pathetic!


Amazing, isn't it? There REALLY isn't any reason to keep trying to
getgetting the same easy answers from the newsgroup, unless someone is
trolling. "


analog: John was referring to YOU and YOUR
diatribes about me being a "terrorist" who wants
to destroy the WWV transmitters!

DUH...

No, John was referring to no one. He insincerely made up the fake claim
about the cruise missies and targeting information.

There's alot of insincerity on usenet.

analogdial wrote:
- show quoted text -
"Isn't it OBVIOUS? The FEDS are well aware of your UN-AMERICAN attempts
to obtain the ABOVE TOP SECRET details and locations of America's ATOMIC
TIME PROGRAM. You have GOOGLESOURCED the entire internet and, of
course, come up with ZILCH. Not even CNN or the NEW YORK TIMES would
dare divulge the SECURE location of America's ATOMIC TIME TRANSMITTERS.

By now, I'm sure you're aware that the US Government has SELECTIVELY
BLOCKED your reception of ATOM TIME. I urge you to turn yourself in to
the FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ATOMIC TIME SECURITY immediately.
There is nowhere or nowhen to hide. "


Sure looks like it came from YOU - in response
to my wanting to know the locations of WWV/B/H
transmitters!

You have proven yourself, in this thread to be both
a Bushie and a Trumpet. Undeniable!

wrote:





Sure looks like it came from YOU - in response
to my wanting to know the locations of WWV/B/H
transmitters!

If this is in reference to the CRUISE MISSILES, I NEVER suggested you
intented to blow up the AMERICAN ATOMIC TIME STATIONS! I did speculate
that you may be thinking of building an ATOMIC TIME BOMB, build an
ATOMIC TIME MACHINE or sell America's ATOMIC TIME SECRETS to the Chinese
before TRUMP sells them to the Russians.

NOTE -- I NEVER suggested you were too STUPID to find the locations of
WWV's transmitters for your self.



You have proven yourself, in this thread to be both
a Bushie and a Trumpet. Undeniable!

TRUMP wants a big construction project? He should build an
All-American half wave vertical mast for WWVB. It would be
YUUUUUUUGE!!!! And it's location must be kept SECRET.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:24:16 -0000 (UTC), analogdial
wrote:

You have proven yourself, in this thread to be both
a Bushie and a Trumpet. Undeniable!

TRUMP wants a big construction project? He should build an
All-American half wave vertical mast for WWVB. It would be
YUUUUUUUGE!!!! And it's location must be kept SECRET.

Here in a nutshell is the biggest problem in this newsgroup. A radio neither
knows nor cares about the political beliefs of the person operating it. I don't
either. Maybe if we stuck to talking about RADIO and kept all this garbage for
other newsgroups where it belongs...

That said...according to my calculations a half wavelength at 60 hz would be
4,100,000 feet. Good luck keeping the location secret. I suspect it might be
visible to the naked eye from anywhere in the western hemisphere - and possibly
from the planet Neptune. LOL!

John D. Kasupski
Niagara Falls, NY

John Kasupski wrote:



Here in a nutshell is the biggest problem in this newsgroup. A radio neither
knows nor cares about the political beliefs of the person operating it. I don't
either. Maybe if we stuck to talking about RADIO and kept all this garbage for
other newsgroups where it belongs...

That said...according to my calculations a half wavelength at 60 hz would be
4,100,000 feet. Good luck keeping the location secret. I suspect it might be
visible to the naked eye from anywhere in the western hemisphere - and possibly
from the planet Neptune. LOL!

John D. Kasupski
Niagara Falls, NY

Why don't you email the folks at WWVB and suggest they change their
broadcast frequency from 60 Hz to 60 kHz? I'm sure they'll appreicate
the suggestion.

analogdial wrote: "Why don't you email the folks at WWVB and suggest they change their
broadcast frequency from 60 Hz to 60 kHz? I'm sure they'll appreicate
the suggestion. "

analog that was nothing but obnoxious.
Can you forgive even a simple typo?

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:42:54 -0000 (UTC), analogdial
wrote:

wrote:

analog: John was referring to YOU and YOUR
diatribes about me being a "terrorist" who wants
to destroy the WWV transmitters!

DUH...

No, John was referring to no one. He insincerely made up the fake claim
about the cruise missies and targeting information.

Not really. I indeed WAS referring to your post - and if the availability of the
hardware wasn't an issue, cruis missiles would be the easiest way to do it since
they are in the military inventories of numerous countries and, being equipped
with their own guidance systems, are pretty much fire-and-forget. Fortunately,
however, you can't simply walk into Home Depot and buy half a dozen cruise
missiles with the necessary means of launching them. That makes the idea of them
being used in a terrorist attack decidedly far-fetched - but what are the odds
of a terrorist, or a group of terrorists, deciding to take out WWV anyway? If
nobody calls in sick on any given day, there's going to be maybe half a dozen
employees there. The way terrorists think, that's way too much effort for far
too little results. Better to do a shopping mall the Saturday before Christmas.

But just for the sake of argument, let's suppose for the moment that for some
reason some "lone wolf" nutcase actually wanted to do it.

Modern field artillery systems could handle the job too, but again, they don't
sell mortars, cannons, and rockets at Wal-Mart, and even if you went down to San
Pedro, California where the USS Iowa is on display as a museum ship and somehow
gained control of the entire vessel, a target somewhere in Colorado would be
more than a little outside the 20.55 nautical mile range of her 16-inch guns.

An aircraft could also be used to attack the site where WWV/WWVB are located,
but that is subject to its own set of obstacles. You won't find bombers, fighter
planes, and the ordnance to arm such aircraft at a local Sam's Club. Uncle Sam
has that stuff, but it's guarded by armed soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines,
and civilian airports have lots of security in place these days too. The odds of
a "lone wolf" conducting such an attack from the air therefore seems pretty
slim, although I suppose it would provide some interesting listening for anyone
within range with a receiver capable of monitoring AICC and guard... grin

Anyway, that basically leaves us with someone physically showing up at the site,
defeating the security measures there, and destroying the transmitters with
explosives or by other means, That may or may not be possible to pull off - but
the attacker(s) wouldn't need the GPS coordinates of the antennas to do it.

Therefore, implying that someone wants to obtain those coordinates for nefarious
purposes is, as I said upthread, pathetic - and also typifies the very kind of
paranoid fear REAL terrorists WANT you to feel. (Why do you think they're called
"terror-ists" to begin with?)

John D. Kasupski
Niagara Falls, NY

John Kasupski wrote:

[snip]

Could you go back to being the "defender of the deliberately obtuse"
troll?

Shouldn't be hard, espically if you're all the same person.