| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 8:00:23 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote:
wrote: Abraham Lincoln: "Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican administration would, directly or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them, about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as once a friend, and still, I hope, not an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears." This was not a lie. The quote comes from a letter from Abe Lincoln to Alexander Stephens. Lincoln had previously stated publicly that he had no intention of doing anything about slavery where it already exists but would block the spread of slavery to the terrorities. Uh...okaaaay. Certainly glad his "Republican administration" didn't interfere with the South. Glad that is settled. smh |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 7:28:21 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote:
wrote: On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 8:00:23 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote: wrote: Abraham Lincoln: "Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican administration would, directly or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them, about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as once a friend, and still, I hope, not an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears." This was not a lie. The quote comes from a letter from Abe Lincoln to Alexander Stephens. Lincoln had previously stated publicly that he had no intention of doing anything about slavery where it already exists but would block the spread of slavery to the terrorities. Uh...okaaaay. Certainly glad his "Republican administration" didn't interfere with the South. Glad that is settled. smh Lincoln assured Stephens, as a friend, that the Lincoln administration would not interefere with slavery where it already existed, as he made clear in his first inaugaral speech. He made no such assurance if they became enemies. Kellyanne throws shade. ...I had never heard of that before. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:51:05 PM UTC-5, DhiaDuit wrote:
Kellyanne throws shade. ...I had never heard of that before. It's was a new one for me also. But then I lived over 50 years of my life before hearing the verbs vet and vetted before listening to it being blathered daily by the talking heads it for the last 10 years. Vet was always someone who served in the military to me. Oh well call me old fashioned. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 12:38:54 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:51:05 PM UTC-5, DhiaDuit wrote: Kellyanne throws shade. ...I had never heard of that before. It's was a new one for me also. But then I lived over 50 years of my life before hearing the verbs vet and vetted before listening to it being blathered daily by the talking heads it for the last 10 years. Vet was always someone who served in the military to me. Oh well call me old fashioned. 'Washington Speak' is the weirdest language I have ever heard before. theduran.com says, BREAKING: Israeli war planes bomb Syria |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 8:10:31 PM UTC-5, Georgy with the stupid last name wrote:
In article , The South fired on the North, not vice versa. And Lincoln's stated goal was always to preserve the Union. That's all right, you'll shoot your mouth off before knowing the facts any time you want to. George You are even stupider than I originally thought. Put away your 7th grade history book and shut the **** up. Lincoln was one of the biggest liars and tyrants in the history of the Presidency. "The Gettysburg Address, the most famous speech in American history, is an absurd piece of war rhetoric and a poetry of lies. We were not “engaged in a great Civil War, to see whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, can long endure.” The South was engaged in a War of Independence from a tyrannical North, and after having legally seceded, wished only “to be let alone.” The North was engaged in a war of empire, to keep the South involuntarily under its yoke. Government “of the people, by the people and for the people” would not have “perished from the earth” had the North lost the war; on the contrary, it perished in the United States when the North won the war; for, freely representative government, by consent of the governed, is exactly what the South was fighting for and exactly what Lincoln’s military victory destroyed." Continued at https://snapoutofitamerica.wordpress...nfederate-war/ Now put your dentures in backward and bite yourself Georgy boy. And while you are at get me towel you broke dick old fart. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 8:10:31 PM UTC-5, Georgy with the stupid last name wrote: In article , The South fired on the North, not vice versa. And Lincoln's stated goal was always to preserve the Union. That's all right, you'll shoot your mouth off before knowing the facts any time you want to. George You are even stupider than I originally thought. Put away your 7th grade history book and shut the **** up. Lincoln was one of the biggest liars and tyrants in the history of the Presidency. "The Gettysburg Address, the most famous speech in American history, is an absurd piece of war rhetoric and a poetry of lies. We were not engaged in a great Civil War, to see whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, can long endure. The South was engaged in a War of Independence from a tyrannical North, and after having legally seceded, wished only to be let alone. The North was engaged in a war of empire, to keep the South involuntarily under its yoke. Government of the people, by the people and for the people would not have perished from the earth had the North lost the war; on the contrary, it perished in the United States when the North won the war; for, it perished in the United States when the North won the war; for, freely representative government, by consent of the governed, is exactly what the South was fighting for and exactly what Lincolns military victory destroyed. and exactly what Lincolns military victory destroyed." Continued at https://snapoutofitamerica.wordpress...nfederate-war/ The attempt at secession was never legal. The United States would have been better off had the slave states which wanted to leave made their case for secession in Congress or in front of the Supreme Court but they knew their most reasoned arguement came from the muzzle of a cannon. A few years after the war, the Supreme Court essentially ruled that no State left the US legally and whatever they did to support the Confederacy was illegal. Neo-Confederates never fail to amuse. For example: "it perished in the United States when the North won the war; for, freely representative government, by consent of the governed, is exactly what the South was fighting for and exactly what Lincolns military victory destroyed." Oh! The tyranny of freeing slaves and giving them full citizenship!! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| SPECIAL No taxpayer bailout for Red China or Wall Street | Shortwave | |||
| SPECIAL No taxpayer bailout for Red China or Wall Street | Shortwave | |||
| Bush To Give Billions of Taxpayer $$$ In Corporate Welfard ToBailout Mortgage Companies | Shortwave | |||
| WAR IS A RACKET by by Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Recipient | Shortwave | |||
| The USA Public School Racket | Shortwave | |||