Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the technologies we have ignored in the BPL discussion is the use
of coherent detection in the BPL circuitry. It provides very high common mode rejection. For example, high rejection to amateur and commercial HF/VHF transmissions, and high signal to noise integrity on the desired frequencies. Coherent detection can very easily pull a signal out from under the noise level. For example, I have used systems where the signal can be 20 dB below the noise and still be recovered. It may just be possible that interference TO the BPL system will not be severe, but interference FROM the BPL system ... well that has been discussed. Deacon Dave, W1MCE + + + Dave Platt wrote: In article , Ryan, KC8PMX wrote: Don't know if anyone has considered this, but if the BPL lines are going to radiate intereference, would it not stand to reason that the lines would be (not by choice) accepting outside RFI sources??? Correct... and there have been some very pithy statements concerning this issue submitted to the FCC. [SNIPPED} |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Antenna | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Dx | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Dx | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Policy | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Shortwave |