Pretty lame Frank. I'm sure that there are others on this group that would be
as interested as I am in seeing the news and commentary sources that you
believe are credible. Levity aside, exactly what and who do you find credible,
or are you more interested in concealing the depth of your liberalness.

For your edification, I listen to and/or read the following.

Alex Jones
Michael Trudeau
John Stadtmiller
Joyce Riley von Kleist & Dave von Kleist
Jeremy Floyd
EWTN
Hal Turner
Rabbi Spivak
Tom Valentine
Michael Trudeau

The LIBERTY NET!

World Net Daily
News Max
World News Net (check out the url http://www.universalradio.com/ )
The Heritage Foundation
The National Review online
The Federal Observer
The Sierra Times
Jewish World Review
Israel National News (Arutz Sheva)
Jerusalem Post Online
Haaretz Online
Human Events Online
Middle East Media Research Institute MEMRI
Islam Online

Ann Coulter
Mona Charen
Walter Williams
Patrick Buchanan
William Buckley

And more……

See Frank, good or bad, at least I can define who and what I read or listen
to. Not PBS stuff for sure, neither is it BBC, but why limit oneself to such a
controlled media. For anyone that thinks otherwise, the liberal media is
highly controlled, both in content and verbiage.

Pursuant to verbiage, the following:

In the Pittsburgh area recently, there has been an unfortunate murder (one of
many anymore), described by the 2 papers available here thus.

Woman and two fetuses murdered.

Pregnant woman murdered.

Which of the above article headlines do you believe represents the "liberal
newspaper"?

Rather tragically the "woman and two fetuses murdered" represents the liberal
rag. No surprise there though, since the liberal sacrament is abortion, and
the host the aborted fetuses. The newspaper is unable to acknowledge that the
murder of the woman represents the loss of three lives. Oh sure, they
acknowledge that the law will regard this crime as a triple murder, but in
spirit they don't acknowledge the true loss of the babies, the human babies,
the same life forms that have been destroyed by the tens of millions by "so
called" doctors. But how could they? We have been inculcated on the topic of
choice, the euphemistic term for a procedure that, when applied to late term
babies, is nothing more than society sanctioned murder. Crush the head, remove
the brains by suction, hey, it's nothing more than a medical procedure, like
removing an unwanted mole or wart.

This is why I read Jewish and Arab publications, because I don't believe
either side, they both lie when the opportunity suits them, as does the U.S.
and Conservatives, and liberals. The truth cannot be divined via a limited
exposure to people of the same ilk, they have the same biases. Despite my
wealth of so called "rightwing extremist" sources, I am also inundated by the
pabulum disseminated by the mainstream media everyday, I did not list those as
sources.

So Frank, in a rare moment of seriousness, especially regarding news and
information sources, if not for the group, how about letting me know your
bias? I have shown you mine.

Regards.




In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"Soliloquy" wrote in message
...

Concerning news and information, for the group's edification, exactly who
do
you listen to and find credible, shortwave or otherwise?

Regards.



I, well, uh -- um, I didn't know the group cared. This is so humbling. But
I have named a first rate news source! Right here on this very newsgroup,
I've expressed my great admiration for the Weekly World News. Even
Chicago's so-called World's Greatest Newspaper (which also owns a radio
station) prints an error correction column, usually several times a week.
No such thing in the WWN!

Of course, if the group desires further elucidation, just ask, en masse.

Frank Dresser