Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:48:28 -0500, Frank Dresser wrote
(in message ): Had the pirate won, and the states became responsible for radio emissions that couldn't be detected across the boarders, I think the states would just hand the job back to the Federal Government, anyway. But I'd like to hear Swarzennegger's and any other candidate's opinions on such issues. Are there Constitutional issues worth considering? Is it practical for a state to regulate radio, or whatever within it's boarder? I doubt a candidate would have a canned answer at hand, but might be able to cobble up a reasonable answer based on a bit of knowledge and some general principles. Frank Dresser -------------------------------------------------------- The problem with states handling frequencies (and power and such) is that we could end up with fifty "MCC"'s (Mississippi Communications Commission) or (FillInTheBlank Communications Commission). Sounds like a tax hike to me sigh. Gray Shockley ----------------------- DX-392 DX-398 RX-320 DX-399 CCradio w/RS Loop Torus Tuner (3-13 MHz) Select-A-Tenna ----------------------- Vicksburg, MS US |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Remote Head for Scanner | Scanner | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
HCRA Annual Auction - Feeding Hills, MA - November 7th | Boatanchors | |||
HCRA Annual Auction - Feeding Hills, MA - November 7th | Boatanchors | |||
HCRA Annual Auction - Feeding Hills, MA - November 7th | Boatanchors |