Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stinger wrote:
Bottom line, it's too bad the trend is toward dropping the requirement. Until now, the morse code requirement served the dual purpose as a de facto "intelligence test" to get in to ham radio, and it also required some committment (which in turn gets hams to respect the medium). What I think worries everyone is that without this requirement, the bar will be lowered to the extent of becoming glorified Citizens Band radio. And that would be a shame. -- Stinger You're repeating the well worn 'badge of honor' justification for requiring morse code, otherwise known as 'I had to do it, so everyone should.' Contrary to what many pro-coders want to believe, the ability to learn morse code has very little to do with higher intelligence. In fact it can be argued that there may be a reverse relationship. It's not unusual for very intelligent people to find it harder to learn certain skills, which are easier for those of average intelligence. Learning morse code may be an example of this. I've known people who were very good at code but were lost when it came to understanding complex subjects requiring a higher level of reasoning. IOW- the ability to learn morse code is not a valid IQ test. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TRADE SX73!!! | Boatanchors | |||
TRADE SX73!!! | Boatanchors | |||
FS or TRADE | Scanner | |||
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Scanner | |||
4-1000A amps for TRADE, pickup near Denver, CO | Boatanchors |