Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's no stopping any avenue of broadband delivery regardless of its
need in the marketplace, or how worthless the content. And dated technolgies such as amateur radio and shortwave broadcasting don't stand a chance of surviving in the face of the broadband Goliaths, because bandwidth, any bandwidth, available by any means, equals big money. So enjoy the MW and HF spectrum while you can, because there's no stopping the encroaching digital hash. We've been degrading it for years with QRM anyway, with every new switching power supply or RF generating unit added to our homes, and millions being added every day. Change is inevitable. I'll surely miss scanning the HF bands with my SX-28, my HQ-120, my homebrew regen, even my Sony 7600. I love HF and I listen to it almost every day. But the "cheese has moved." If you live well outside of suburbia, or on the open sea, you can tune or use what's left of HF. Otherwise, you should look elsewhere for your radio fix. Pete KQ5I |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Verrando" wrote in message om... There's no stopping any avenue of broadband delivery regardless of its need in the marketplace, or how worthless the content. And dated technolgies such as amateur radio and shortwave broadcasting don't stand a chance of surviving in the face of the broadband Goliaths, because bandwidth, any bandwidth, available by any means, equals big money. So enjoy the MW and HF spectrum while you can, because there's no stopping the encroaching digital hash. We've been degrading it for years with QRM anyway, with every new switching power supply or RF generating unit added to our homes, and millions being added every day. Change is inevitable. I'll surely miss scanning the HF bands with my SX-28, my HQ-120, my homebrew regen, even my Sony 7600. I love HF and I listen to it almost every day. But the "cheese has moved." If you live well outside of suburbia, or on the open sea, you can tune or use what's left of HF. Otherwise, you should look elsewhere for your radio fix. Pete KQ5I Are you saying broadband access and HF radiation must necessarily go together? If so, why? Frank Dresser Frank Dresser |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser schrieb:
Are you saying broadband access and HF radiation must necessarily go together? If so, why? Good q. I have what can be called broadband 'net access (DSL with 768k down / 128k up), and I have more trouble with the hets generated by ISDN (it's a combo ISDN/DSL thing with a splitter) or rather the radiation from the apparently unshielded ISDN cable from the ISDN NTBA to the telephone base station than any other "telephone line" related effects. Something that does radiate heavily, on the other hand, is my (cheap) Fast Ethernet switch, also via the wiring, followed by my computers. (OK, *that* stuff is in the same room as my SWL eq't. I think I needn't mention that I always "pull the plug" on all possible sources of interference before SWLing - all the computer stuff and the DSL modem/router.) Powerline Communications has been proven to be inefficient for any larger number of users and thus is good for inhouse comm at most. I don't see any good reason to promote it except wanting to get a number of phone calls and letters from angry hams and SWLs. Frank Dresser Frank Dresser I should *really* be drinking less, it seems. (But less than nothing? *scratching head* [1]) Stephan [1] OK, it's a lame old joke, plus I wouldn't even see double even when drunk, but what the heck. ![]() -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ | Webm.: http://www.i24.com/ PC#6: i440LX, 2xCel300A, 448 MB, 18 GB, ATI AGP 32 MB, 110W This is a SCSI-inside, Legacy-plus, TCPA-free computer ![]() Reply to newsgroup only. | See home page for working e-mail address. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you saying broadband access and HF radiation must necessarily go
together? If so, why? As a commodity, the HF spectrum can be more greatly exploited for profit as a means of delivering data bandwidth than as a means of mass communication or 2-way comms. Broadcasting via terrestrial MW/HF/VHF/UHF transmission can be virtually replaced by broadband/digital, cell or satellite technology anyway. Broadcasters look forward to the day when they can mothball their multi-kilowatt transmitter sites and the engineers they pay to keep them running. Imagine the savings in electricity alone! I have a buddy who, thru his Sprint wireless internet connection, can listen to RealAudio sites from his laptop while driving in his car. It's just a matter of time! Pete KQ5I |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "pete" wrote in message news:01c38899$27465380$4c1588cf@verrando... Are you saying broadband access and HF radiation must necessarily go together? If so, why? As a commodity, the HF spectrum can be more greatly exploited for profit as a means of delivering data bandwidth than as a means of mass communication or 2-way comms. MW/HF isn't much bandwidth. 30 MHz tops. As a comparison, the FM spectrum alone is 2/3 of that . Or 5 TV channels. There's nothing favoring broadband data transmissions on such low frequencies. Efficent antennas are very large. Directional antennas aimed at one point source are almost impossible. There's alot of interference from natural sources such as thunderstorms. Radiated interference can come from halfway across the state, or half way across the world. VHF/UHF beats MW/HF for broadband communications on all counts. Broadcasting via terrestrial MW/HF/VHF/UHF transmission can be virtually replaced by broadband/digital, cell or satellite technology anyway. Broadcasters look forward to the day when they can mothball their multi-kilowatt transmitter sites and the engineers they pay to keep them running. Imagine the savings in electricity alone! OK. Let's say electricity costs 10 cents a kilowatt hour. A 50 kW transmitter uses 5 bucks worth of electricty an hour. Imagine how much more poor Rush Limbaugh could make if transmitters weren't bleeding the network dry! Now that I think of it, the real money would be found in creating automated talk show hosts. One or two more advances in computerized vocalization, and Sean Hannity is on the soup line. I have a buddy who, thru his Sprint wireless internet connection, can listen to RealAudio sites from his laptop while driving in his car. It's just a matter of time! Pete KQ5I Oh. What part of the HF/MW spectrum does it use? Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|