Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you saying broadband access and HF radiation must necessarily go
together? If so, why? As a commodity, the HF spectrum can be more greatly exploited for profit as a means of delivering data bandwidth than as a means of mass communication or 2-way comms. Broadcasting via terrestrial MW/HF/VHF/UHF transmission can be virtually replaced by broadband/digital, cell or satellite technology anyway. Broadcasters look forward to the day when they can mothball their multi-kilowatt transmitter sites and the engineers they pay to keep them running. Imagine the savings in electricity alone! I have a buddy who, thru his Sprint wireless internet connection, can listen to RealAudio sites from his laptop while driving in his car. It's just a matter of time! Pete KQ5I |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "pete" wrote in message news:01c38899$27465380$4c1588cf@verrando... Are you saying broadband access and HF radiation must necessarily go together? If so, why? As a commodity, the HF spectrum can be more greatly exploited for profit as a means of delivering data bandwidth than as a means of mass communication or 2-way comms. MW/HF isn't much bandwidth. 30 MHz tops. As a comparison, the FM spectrum alone is 2/3 of that . Or 5 TV channels. There's nothing favoring broadband data transmissions on such low frequencies. Efficent antennas are very large. Directional antennas aimed at one point source are almost impossible. There's alot of interference from natural sources such as thunderstorms. Radiated interference can come from halfway across the state, or half way across the world. VHF/UHF beats MW/HF for broadband communications on all counts. Broadcasting via terrestrial MW/HF/VHF/UHF transmission can be virtually replaced by broadband/digital, cell or satellite technology anyway. Broadcasters look forward to the day when they can mothball their multi-kilowatt transmitter sites and the engineers they pay to keep them running. Imagine the savings in electricity alone! OK. Let's say electricity costs 10 cents a kilowatt hour. A 50 kW transmitter uses 5 bucks worth of electricty an hour. Imagine how much more poor Rush Limbaugh could make if transmitters weren't bleeding the network dry! Now that I think of it, the real money would be found in creating automated talk show hosts. One or two more advances in computerized vocalization, and Sean Hannity is on the soup line. I have a buddy who, thru his Sprint wireless internet connection, can listen to RealAudio sites from his laptop while driving in his car. It's just a matter of time! Pete KQ5I Oh. What part of the HF/MW spectrum does it use? Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|