Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't advocate any of this. But given the state of business today,
and the inclination to snatch up every available slice of the bandwidth pie, it would not suprise me if something like this happens. I don't have mastery of all the technical details, or the marketing details, it just seems rather possible and probable. If there's a more effecient way to use the HF spectrum, a better way to make more money from it, or to save more money in using it, they'll do it. Amateur radio and shortwave are of so little consequence to this planet. Only the tiniest miniorty of kermudgeons and geeks (us) would miss it when its gone. If big business has even the vaguest idea of how to exploit HF, they'll snatch it up. And in the US, the FCC will sell it to the highest bidder. If broadcasters could make more money without a transmitter, they'll do it. The only loyalty is to the bottom line. I do a lot of media work for the Nat'l Assoc. of Homebuilders. Their message to developers on land: if it's for sale, buy it. Buy and develop as much land as your resources will allow. Even if you don't need it, even the smallest parcel, buy it anyway. You can bet that the same goes for spectrum developers. Pete KQ5I |