Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Both radios have their assets, I have the newer 71 with pbt but the pbt on
the 75 is a finer adjustment for me anyway...the R75 is an improvement in many aspects - I think better sensitivity and selectivity - front end is not as sensitive to overload. The DSP is a nice touch and the only after-market addition I have added - it came free with radio from Gigaparts. Sure does clean up the sound on the 75...but I like both radios a whole lot. Though the 75 has a few more features, the 71 stands alone on its own merit. You can't go wrong with either radio ![]() john "Andy Bown" wrote in message m... Hi John As you have both the R71 and R75, how do you find they compare? DSP aside, is there much difference in their performance? Have either of your radios had any mods or options installed? Cheers and enjoy your radios Andy |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:08:00 +0200, Stephan Grossklass
wrote: No, these 80s beasts don't use 455 kHz as last IF for AM/SSB yet, just as 3rd IF for for FM, which means good replacement filters virtually have to be crystal ones. The current IC-R75 uses a 2nd IF of 9.0115 MHz and a 3rd IF of 455 kHz, and allows using filters on both. Actually, the architecture of the R75 is derived from the R71A (I have one of each, and service manuals with schematics for the R71A and for my IC-751A, whose receiver section is, basically, an R71A). All have an up-conversion 1st IF, followed by 9MHz 2nd IF and 455kHz 3rd IF. Both my R71A and my 751A have Collins mechanical filters which I installed in their 455kHz IFs. The R75 is basically a cost-reduced R71A, with decent audio (relative to the muddy audio of the R71A) and with dual PBT which is an improvement on the less flexible PBT on the R71A (and 751A). All are excellent utility monitoring receivers, with the R75 having slightly higher sensitivity and a slightly better noise floor. The R75 can also be used as a decent SWL broadcast listening receiver. None of the three can stand up to an RX340, but then again their combined cost is less. Good listening, Al ================================================= Location: 42N39, 71W09 (Near Boston, MA) HF Antennas: 65ft TFD, 45ft T2FD, 28ft vertical, 65ft doublet HF Receivers: Ten-Tec RX340, RX320, Harris R2368, Cubic R3030A Decoders: Code300-32, Universal M-8000, PK-232MBX/DSP ================================================= |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ICOM R71A knob and collar needed | Equipment | |||
ICOM R71A knob and collar needed | Equipment | |||
Trade Icom R71A for Kenwood R5000 | Equipment | |||
Trade Icom R71A for Kenwood R5000 | Equipment | |||
Trade Icom R71A for Kenwood R5000 | Boatanchors |