Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old October 16th 03, 07:31 PM
radiobuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Both radios have their assets, I have the newer 71 with pbt but the pbt on
the 75 is a finer adjustment for me anyway...the R75 is an improvement in
many aspects - I think better sensitivity and selectivity - front end is not
as sensitive to overload. The DSP is a nice touch and the only after-market
addition I have added - it came free with radio from Gigaparts. Sure does
clean up the sound on the 75...but I like both radios a whole lot. Though
the 75 has a few more features, the 71 stands alone on its own merit. You
can't go wrong with either radio

john

"Andy Bown" wrote in message
m...
Hi John

As you have both the R71 and R75, how do you find they compare? DSP
aside, is there much difference in their performance? Have either of
your radios had any mods or options installed?

Cheers and enjoy your radios

Andy



  #22   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 01:44 AM
Albert P. Belle Isle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:08:00 +0200, Stephan Grossklass
wrote:


No, these 80s beasts
don't use 455 kHz as last IF for AM/SSB yet, just as 3rd IF for for FM,
which means good replacement filters virtually have to be crystal ones.
The current IC-R75 uses a 2nd IF of 9.0115 MHz and a 3rd IF of 455 kHz,
and allows using filters on both.


Actually, the architecture of the R75 is derived from the R71A (I have
one of each, and service manuals with schematics for the R71A and for
my IC-751A, whose receiver section is, basically, an R71A).

All have an up-conversion 1st IF, followed by 9MHz 2nd IF and 455kHz
3rd IF. Both my R71A and my 751A have Collins mechanical filters which
I installed in their 455kHz IFs.

The R75 is basically a cost-reduced R71A, with decent audio (relative
to the muddy audio of the R71A) and with dual PBT which is an
improvement on the less flexible PBT on the R71A (and 751A).

All are excellent utility monitoring receivers, with the R75 having
slightly higher sensitivity and a slightly better noise floor. The R75
can also be used as a decent SWL broadcast listening receiver.

None of the three can stand up to an RX340, but then again their
combined cost is less.


Good listening,
Al
=================================================
Location: 42N39, 71W09 (Near Boston, MA)
HF Antennas: 65ft TFD, 45ft T2FD, 28ft vertical, 65ft doublet
HF Receivers: Ten-Tec RX340, RX320, Harris R2368, Cubic R3030A
Decoders: Code300-32, Universal M-8000, PK-232MBX/DSP
=================================================
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ICOM R71A knob and collar needed BDK Equipment 0 December 17th 03 06:30 PM
ICOM R71A knob and collar needed BDK Equipment 0 December 17th 03 06:30 PM
Trade Icom R71A for Kenwood R5000 tim Equipment 0 July 13th 03 04:54 AM
Trade Icom R71A for Kenwood R5000 tim Equipment 0 July 13th 03 04:54 AM
Trade Icom R71A for Kenwood R5000 tim Boatanchors 0 July 13th 03 04:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017