Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A heart felt THANK YOU from all sane Americans Judge Ohmer! You are
truly an oasis of enlightenment in a desert of ignorance. Proof that the USA is still a great nation! When one sane man can overrule the ignorant masses, well it just doesn't get any better than that. Thankfully the Judge Ohmer's of the country are spread quite strategically throughout the judicial system. I plan on writing a personal thank you note to him and encourage all of you to do likewise. Thank you for your cooperation. Keke Goldfeller ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Concealed Weapons Law Blocked in Missouri Sat Oct 11, 5:46 AM ET Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo! By JEFF LATZKE, Associated Press Writer ST. LOUIS - A judge temporarily blocked a law that would make Missouri the 45th state to authorize concealed guns. Circuit Judge Steven Ohmer ruled Friday that the law needed a further review by the state Supreme Court and would have caused irreparable harm had it taken effect Saturday. The judge cited comments from debate at Missouri's constitutional convention of 1875 that carrying concealed weapons is "a practice which cannot be too severely condemned" and is connected to "incalculable evil." An appeal of the order filed by Attorney General Jay Nixon with the state's Eastern District Court of Appeals was denied a short time later. Nixon filed a second appeal with the state Supreme Court, but Bill Thompson, a counsel for the high court, said it would not issue a ruling Friday. It was unclear when the state Supreme Court would take up the appeal. Ohmer scheduled an Oct. 23 hearing to determine whether to impose a permanent injunction. Missouri entered the ranks of states allowing concealed guns when the Legislature overrode Gov. Bob Holden's veto last month. The new law also bars identification of concealed weapons permit-holders. Advocates say the laws have contributed to drops in violent crime by deterring criminals unsure whether a potential victim might be armed. Holden and other critics say more guns in circulation will lead to more violence. "The conceal and carry law ... was obviously flawed in many respects," Holden said in a statement Friday. "I believe the court took appropriate action today by preventing this ill-conceived law from taking effect." Supporters of the law predicted that they eventually will prevail. "The plaintiffs went judge shopping and they found what they wanted," said attorney Kevin Jamison, president of the Western Missouri Shooters Alliance. "Their petition is unbelievably frivolous. It shows a complete misunderstanding of the law." The plaintiffs in the case include public officials, members of the St. Louis Clergy Coalition and the nonprofit Institute for Peace and Justice. The group cited a section of the Bill of Rights from the 1945 Missouri Constitution that declared the right to bear arms "shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons" — and a similar clause in the 1875 version of the Missouri Constitution. The Missouri attorney general's office argued the constitutional clauses express a reservation, not a prohibition on concealed weapons. Because the temporary restraining order came so close to the law's effective date, Cole County Sheriff John Hemeyer had said his office would accept applications as planned Saturday. He changed his mind later Friday, saying he didn't want to tie up application fees. Other sheriffs had not planned on accepting applications until next Tuesday. Ohmer agreed to hear the case in St. Louis after the city's sheriff was added as a defendant. Most lawsuits against the state are tried in Cole County, where the state capital is located. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And hopefully God will allow us to deal with the hateful judge in his due time!
Lloyd Davies - Time Lord and Talk show host "On the Domestic Front" http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domesticfront/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Keke Goldfeller) wrote in
m: Sir, I do believe that your underpants are on too tight. Pennsylvania has had concealed carry for many years, there are no problems as a result of it. In fact, the number of people illegally carrying firearms and for criminal purposes is tremendous. The offset of these gun toting criminals by citizens duly authorized to carry firearms is a welcome situation. Nothing makes my heart so warm as to hear of a citizen, legally carrying a firearm, in the age of police department personnel and budget cuts, etc, whacking a criminal that truly deserves it. Remember, a liberal is a conservative that hasn't been victimized yet. Astonishingly, some people that are vehemently anti-gun have themselves been caught with guns. You see, they are responsible enough to own them, they claimed, it's their desire to take them from the rest of us that they lust after. Buy a police radio, listen everyday as I do, and realize that unless you live in the richest areas of your city that it's likely that the police won't arrive in time to circumvent a violent crime committed at your home, against your loved ones, by some criminal. Though they will do the necessary work as far as arranging for the transporting of your family's bodies to the morgue! http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.sh...000/5/25/94428 http://www.stentorian.com/2ndamend/pigstick.html The image at this link represents Rosie "the enormous lesbian pig" O'Donnell In your peanut size monomaniacal brain, you see a "specific issue" fueled by your ignorance. You hate guns, period. Anything done in furtherance of this hatred to you is justified. Similar judges find mystical reasons to justify abortion and to justify the complete removal of Religion from public life. Refer to "Umbras and Penumbras" "The same criticism was leveled long ago at Justice William O. Douglas when he found the right to privacy-never stated in the Constitution-emanating from "umbras and penumbras" of other rights, which eventually led to the decriminalization of abortion in Roe v. Wade." Umbra is the complete shadowed areas that an eclipsing body projects on the eclipsed body. Penumbra is the incomplete shadowed area projected on the eclipsed body. They are terms from Astronomy. Look under the picture for Umbra on the following page: http://www.enchantedlearning.com/sub...y/indexu.shtml Is this what we have to look forward to by American Judges, endlessly circumventing the will of the people, governing from the bench? It's time for this to come to an end, too many judges imposing too many laws on people due to mystical interpretations of the Constitution. Dr. Artaud A heart felt THANK YOU from all sane Americans Judge Ohmer! You are truly an oasis of enlightenment in a desert of ignorance. Proof that the USA is still a great nation! When one sane man can overrule the ignorant masses, well it just doesn't get any better than that. Thankfully the Judge Ohmer's of the country are spread quite strategically throughout the judicial system. I plan on writing a personal thank you note to him and encourage all of you to do likewise. Thank you for your cooperation. Keke Goldfeller |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another judge overriding the democratic process, I presume.
Bill, K5BY |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr. Artaud" wrote:
(Keke Goldfeller) wrote in m: Sir, I do believe that your underpants are on too tight. Pennsylvania has had concealed carry for many years, there are no problems as a result of it. In fact, the number of people illegally carrying firearms and for criminal purposes is tremendous. The offset of these gun toting criminals by citizens duly authorized to carry firearms is a welcome situation. Nothing makes my heart so warm as to hear of a citizen, legally carrying a firearm, in the age of police department personnel and budget cuts, etc, whacking a criminal that truly deserves it. Remember, a liberal is a conservative that hasn't been victimized yet. Astonishingly, some people that are vehemently anti-gun have themselves been caught with guns. You see, they are responsible enough to own them, they claimed, it's their desire to take them from the rest of us that they lust after. Buy a police radio, listen everyday as I do, and realize that unless you live in the richest areas of your city that it's likely that the police won't arrive in time to circumvent a violent crime committed at your home, against your loved ones, by some criminal. Though they will do the necessary work as far as arranging for the transporting of your family's bodies to the morgue! http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.sh...000/5/25/94428 http://www.stentorian.com/2ndamend/pigstick.html The image at this link represents Rosie "the enormous lesbian pig" O'Donnell In your peanut size monomaniacal brain, you see a "specific issue" fueled by your ignorance. You hate guns, period. Anything done in furtherance of this hatred to you is justified. Similar judges find mystical reasons to justify abortion and to justify the complete removal of Religion from public life. Refer to "Umbras and Penumbras" "The same criticism was leveled long ago at Justice William O. Douglas when he found the right to privacy-never stated in the Constitution-emanating from "umbras and penumbras" of other rights, which eventually led to the decriminalization of abortion in Roe v. Wade." Umbra is the complete shadowed areas that an eclipsing body projects on the eclipsed body. Penumbra is the incomplete shadowed area projected on the eclipsed body. They are terms from Astronomy. Look under the picture for Umbra on the following page: http://www.enchantedlearning.com/sub...y/indexu.shtml Is this what we have to look forward to by American Judges, endlessly circumventing the will of the people, governing from the bench? It's time for this to come to an end, too many judges imposing too many laws on people due to mystical interpretations of the Constitution. Dr. Artaud The numbers show that a handgun owner (concealed or not) is more likely to be killed by his own weapon or to have a family member killed with it, than using it to stop a criminal. However the typical handgun owner believes the statistics don't apply to him. They probably don't wear a seat belt either. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WShoots1 wrote:
Another judge overriding the democratic process, I presume. Bill, K5BY You presume entirely wrong, then. Judicial review is an integral part of the democratic process in the US, and has been since the start. *Bypassing* judicial review, the Constitutionally-mandated role of the judicial branch, would be overriding the democratic process. Including it when there are parties suing from both sides, is merely a case of that judge discharging his Constitutional duty as expressly constructed under our US Constitution, and arrived at a ruling you don't personally agree with. Override the democratic process, my ass. You're lying. So next time, instead of mouthing foolish right-wing propaganda and lies about "overriding the Democratic process" whenever things don't go your way, try making better arguments. And when you lose, instead of whining about "overriding the Democratic process" (which is entirely false), try appealing your case if it was poorly decided. Of course, that would require a respect for the system of government we have, above winning. If it was a bad ruling, then appeal it. But don't lie. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:08:00 -0500, Herbert West wrote
(in message ): I don't see any evidence in this thread of his "losing" any arguments. This was his *first* albeit, misinformed, comment. Yeah but is it true that one is not allowed to carry a concealed radio in Missouri? Is it all radios, including am and fm? Or is it just shortwave or is it longwave? And are we going to protest concealed carry on MW or just on AM? Gray Shockley -------------------------------------------------------- Just wait 'til I get my subsciption to "World Weekly News" and I'll have Batboy rattle your cage. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gray Shockley wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:08:00 -0500, Herbert West wrote (in message ): I don't see any evidence in this thread of his "losing" any arguments. This was his *first* albeit, misinformed, comment. Yeah but is it true that one is not allowed to carry a concealed radio in Missouri? Is it all radios, including am and fm? Or is it just shortwave or is it longwave? And are we going to protest concealed carry on MW or just on AM? Gray Shockley I think you can carry any concealed radio in Missouri if you are over 18, and it is unloaded - so take the batteries out first. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack" wrote in message ... Since most commercial VHF gear now include wide-band receivers, any ham carrying one in his car is at risk of arrest. Perhaps we could consider it an "open-receiver" law? g There is federal law that supercedes all state and local law in this domain. I know it's a royal pain to have to appear in court at all, but if you go to court, and cite the appropriate statute, the case is always dismissed (of course, you also have to show your FCC Amateur Radio license). |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:22:53 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .. . Since most commercial VHF gear now include wide-band receivers, any ham carrying one in his car is at risk of arrest. Perhaps we could consider it an "open-receiver" law? g There is federal law that supercedes all state and local law in this domain. I know it's a royal pain to have to appear in court at all, but if you go to court, and cite the appropriate statute, the case is always dismissed (of course, you also have to show your FCC Amateur Radio license). Tell that to the poor ham in NYS that just spent the better part of 2003 and many court appearances before a Judge would accept the federal law. I believe it was brought up early in the proceedings. The case was documented and followed in several ham websites, including ARRL, though I don't have the exact URLs. We all knew he'd eventually win - it was just a matter of when the idiot judges would come to their senses. A major PITA, and of course, not even an apology from the authorities afterward. -jack- Did he get his radio back? Sometimes the police *misplace* the radio. IOW- Someone takes it home. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT- Chili Cookoff | CB |