| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tony Meloche wrote in message ...
grumpus wrote: Hi all. This past Spring I put my Cambridge Soundworks Model 88 table radio, designed by the late Henry Kloss, through its paces on the FM broadcast band. For the duration of the test, the radio sat in one place in a ground floor room. The only antenna used was a cheap $2 plastic dipole tacked haphazardly to the wall; it too remained in one place throughout the test. Here are my results (4 part log snipped). Good post, Grumpus. It appears that the radio has excellent sensitivity with a very conventional antenna, and that your maximum distance reception was about 120 miles - that would be top-end for any good FM receiver with a dipole. It also appears that CING, Burlington (Hamilton) is the old CKDS that I used to listen to all day when I was working in Western New York during the summers of 1970, '71 and '72. I would be more interested in how many of those stations past the 90 mile range you were getting in good, listenable stereo. In "the old days", any good, two-channel stereo image at a distance of 100 miles was considered to be top-flight FM DX. Tony Hi Tony. Neither the Gale Directory or CING's website indicate a history for this station before 1976 under whatever call letters, but you may well be correct. Bruce Elving's newest FM Atlas shows that CING has migrated to 105.3 and a new station, CJXY, now occupies 107.9. It would be a stretch to say that I get a lot of the 90 mile plus stations in "good, listenable stereo". This exercise was intended more as a DXing demonstration with bare bones equipment in challenging conditions than anything else. Still, one of the presets is set to 99.1 CBLA-FM Toronto CBC Radio One which is 109 miles from my location. Overnight they replay a variety of newscasts from around the world. Very often their signal comes in in stereo, especially during the Winter. I don't think I've even begun to maximize the Model 88's FM performance. For one thing, my ground floor location is bounded on the south by an enormous three story triplex 40' away, and a two story home 6' away on the north. I think if I can get a good Yagi up above the rooftops this radio would really shine. Regards, Grumpus ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
grumpus wrote:
Hi Tony. Neither the Gale Directory or CING's website indicate a history for this station before 1976 under whatever call letters, but you may well be correct. Bruce Elving's newest FM Atlas shows that CING has migrated to 105.3 and a new station, CJXY, now occupies 107.9. It would be a stretch to say that I get a lot of the 90 mile I think you mean 95.3 for CING. It swapped frequencies with CJXY a year or two ago. Neither station is actually "new". 95.3 was CKDS in 1973; 107.9 came into existence as CING in 1976. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doug Smith W9WI wrote in message ...
grumpus wrote: Hi Tony. Neither the Gale Directory or CING's website indicate a history for this station before 1976 under whatever call letters, but you may well be correct. Bruce Elving's newest FM Atlas shows that CING has migrated to 105.3 and a new station, CJXY, now occupies 107.9. It would be a stretch to say that I get a lot of the 90 mile I think you mean 95.3 for CING. It swapped frequencies with CJXY a year or two ago. Neither station is actually "new". 95.3 was CKDS in 1973; 107.9 came into existence as CING in 1976. You're probably right Doug, I wasn't sure if I remembered CING's new frequency correctly even as I wrote it down...goes to show you don't always fly when you wing it. Regards ,Grumpus |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| a great read | CB | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Three (Communicator License) | Policy | |||