Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg, in A/B tests with a standard dipole, the cage was "quieter". That is, I
am able to hear weaker signals with less noise. Anecdotal at best, but keeps me using one. I am under 2:1 from 3575 to 3925 with no tuner. I suspect that if I were using copper Vs the fence wire the Q would be higher and the results more in agreement with your cage program. Besides it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling and impresses the neighbors. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... The only difference in performance between a cage antenna and an ordinary thin-wire dipole is a modest increase in bandwidth. There is no increase in radiating/receiving efficience. The increase in bandwidth is much less than is popularly supposed and may not be considered worth the extra construction costs and inconvenience. To predict resonant frequency, bandwidth and a few other characteristics from overall length, number of cage wires from 1 to N, and wire diameter, download program DIPCAGE from website below. Download DIPCAGE in a few seconds, no unzipping inconvenience, run immediately. ---- ======================= Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.g4fgq.com ======================= |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
New antenna technology??? | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |