wrote in message ... "Louis C. LeVine" wrote: This came from another radio group. They are doing a survey to find out why some people do not like the ARRL. I don't like it because it costs to much. If it were $10 a year I might consider joining. Louis I neither approve of or disapprove of the ARRL. Yes, the dews are high. If they where lower they could attract more potential members. With the majority of hams being senior citizens, the ARRL needs to take that into consideration when it comes to dews. WE all know that seniors are on a fixed income. Members should be given a choice of what magazine they would like when joining the ARRL. I showed a copy of QST to a new ham friend and ash him if he was interested. His comment after looking over the magazine was: The magazine is to technical for him and most likely other new hams, the cost for membership is to high. For me, the ARRL reminds me of the Federal Government. We elect the officials who are supposed to be working for the membership, but they do as they darn well please once they are in office. Who is in bed with whom. I dropped my membership for the reasons I have stated above. A choice of magazines? Explain please. Its a bureaucracy. And according to Doctor Peters, who wrote a book called 'Peters principle' many years ago: "In a bureaucracy everyone will eventually arise to their level of incompetence" Dan/W4NTI |
Grümwîtch thë Ünflãppåblê wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote : : And the alternitive is? : DARC works good for us. So you went over to the DARC side? - Mike KB3EIA - |
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message Its a bureaucracy. And according to Doctor Peters, who wrote a book called 'Peters principle' many years ago: I believe you meant the "Peter principal" named after the author Peter F. Drucker. He was a management guru! |
"Roger Gt" wrote I believe you meant the "Peter principal" named after the author Peter F. Drucker. He was a management guru! No, he meant the "The Peter Priciple", from the book by that title written by Dr. Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull. Peter Drucker had nothing to do with it. Good luck on this one now! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Jose wrote:
I don't lilke the ARRL, because QST does not print any articles on Freebanding. Freebanding IS more popular than ham radio, and we represent almost 15 million new potential ARRL members. Too bad the ARRL Yankees can't figure this out. Jose Why should the ARRL or anyone else, support a bunch of illegal law breaking operators? |
Jose wrote:
You should really self-examine the hatred in your heart, especially during this festive of seasons. Alfa-Tango International is the licensing authority. And it has no authority other than what it self subscribes. The FCC is the only authority that can issue licenses to use the radio spectrum in the U.S. and other countries have their own license structure. Alfa-Tango International has no authority to issue licenses for any use of the radio spectrum. It is just more "freeband" nonsense, and there is no "freeband" in the U.S. as those frequencies you use as a "freeband" are allocated to other services who have ligitimate licenses to use those frequencies. You ATI license isn't worth the paper it is written on and carries no authority whatsoever. |
Thanks, I couldn't see a connection with Drucker!
So it is spelled "Priciple"? That would explain why I didn't find it! This one? ------------------------------- About the Author Before Dr. Laurence Peter's death in 1988, he was a professor of education at the University of Southern California and at the University of British Columbia. Raymond Hull lives in British Columbia. This best-selling business classic of more than twenty-five years' duration is a dead-on account of why boredom, bungling, and bad management are built into every organization. Through hilarious case histories and cartoons adapted from Punch, Dr. Peter shows how America's corporate career track drives employees relentlessly upward -- until they get promoted into jobs they just can't do and wind up desperately treading water, driving their colleagues crazy, and dragging down productivity and profit. ------------------------------- 73 OM DE K7DUP "KØHB" wrote in message n "Roger Gt" wrote I believe you meant the "Peter principal" named after the author Peter F. Drucker. He was a management guru! No, he meant the "The Peter Priciple", from the book by that title written by Dr. Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull. Peter Drucker had nothing to do with it. Good luck on this one now! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
KØHB wrote:
"William Mutch" wrote I think a lot of the long gray vanity call lists of DX and contest results should be moved out of QST and onto some sub menu web page where the three people who give a damn could look them up. You must have been distracted by a passing bimbo or something, but DXCC listings were removed from QST several years ago and moved to the DXCC Annual Report which goes only to DXCC participants. What's that on page 94-99 of the August 2003 QST then? |
Jose wrote:
I don't lilke the ARRL, because QST does not print any articles on Freebanding. Freebanding IS more popular than ham radio, and we represent almost 15 million new potential ARRL members. Too bad the ARRL Yankees can't figure this out. What about the ARRL Red Sox? ;-) |
Its a bureaucracy. And according to Doctor Peters, who wrote a book called 'Peters principle' many years ago: "In a bureaucracy everyone will eventually arise to their level of incompetence" That "incompetence" is more usually a lack of sufficient office politics skills than technical skills. "Dilbert" is on target more often than you would believe if you never had to work for a large corporation. AT&T was the worst with this. There you worked on stuff not because there was a chance that it might make the company any money, but because your boss thinks it will impress his boss. Other instances are when your department didn't spend all its allocated budget for the year, so the boss has people order equipment that might be useful in the future. Known as "Use it or lose it", as next year's budget would likely be scaled back if this year's isn't fully spent. I have run across incompetent people in companies I've worked for, but it's actually quite rare. One guy who didn't know what he was doing just tried to wing it. And his work was very faulty. But by far most incompetence is found in management. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com