ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote in message ...
From: (Brian)

Wow, more stellar reasoning!

First, I've never supported illegal workers replacing US workers.

You did by omission.

By omission?? If you use that twisted reasoning then GW is clearly responsible
for US jobs going overseas by "omitting" to do anything about it.

You really are one of the most stupid conservatives I've ever encountered.
Keep up the fine work!

Bryant

Mike, you get way too excited, and you like to call people names.
Maybe one day we can have a rational discussion about the Feds,
Unions, and overseas work. Let me know when.

Brian

That's precisely why I "plonked" him earlier.

Bryant doesn't debate -- he insults, labels, and name-calls, then pretends
that he's debating (all the while typing aloof and condecending rhetoric).

Some folks actually buy that act -- but most others see it as the insipid,
cliche-riddled rambling of a small mind that it is. Just ignore him.

-- Stinger


"Brian" wrote in message
m...
ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
...
From: (Brian)

Wow, more stellar reasoning!

First, I've never supported illegal workers replacing US workers.

You did by omission.

By omission?? If you use that twisted reasoning then GW is clearly
responsible
for US jobs going overseas by "omitting" to do anything about it.

You really are one of the most stupid conservatives I've ever
encountered.
Keep up the fine work!

Bryant

Mike, you get way too excited, and you like to call people names.
Maybe one day we can have a rational discussion about the Feds,
Unions, and overseas work. Let me know when.

Brian

From: "Stinger"


That's precisely why I "plonked" him earlier.

Bryant doesn't debate -- he insults, labels, and name-calls, then pretends
that he's debating (all the while typing aloof and condecending rhetoric).

Some folks actually buy that act -- but most others see it as the insipid,
cliche-riddled rambling of a small mind that it is. Just ignore him.


Let's return to Rush Limbaugh, then. Why does he avoid your critique of
"condescending rhetoric"? My style is mild compared to most conservative
talk-show hosts.

Kind of makes a point, doesn't it?

Bryant
Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:
snip
...My style is mild compared to most conservative
talk-show hosts.

Kind of makes a point, doesn't it?


Perhaps the point would be you haven't listened to enough conservative
talk show hosts?

From: "Mark S. Holden"

Michael Bryant wrote:
snip
...My style is mild compared to most conservative
talk-show hosts.

Kind of makes a point, doesn't it?


Perhaps the point would be you haven't listened to enough conservative
talk show hosts?

Believe it or not, Mark, I'm addicted to conservative radio talk shows. I try
to catch a bit of Limbaugh's program everyday. I'm not sure we agree on
anything, but YOU need to listen more if you don't agree that Rush uses an
"in-your-face" style of rhetoric.

BTW, the replacement hosts during Rush's weeks in rehab were far less
entertaining.

I actually think that a number of conservative positions have compelling
supporting arguments, but fortunately (for me!) many of the posters in this NG
seem oblivious to the best arguments behind their beliefs.

Maybe I can goad them into a deeper effort to understand what they got going.
;-)

Happy New Year,

Bryant
Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)