![]() |
I've done many mod's on HF receivers that weren't "practical". Most
owners wouldn't have bothered but I enjoy making a receiver better. RHF wrote: STARMAN, NP2 = Not Practical -and/or- Not Possible Due to the Icom IC-R75's Layout and Construction the (built-in) Internal 1.5" Speaker: Is What It Is [.] FWIW: A Modification that 'added' an Internal Speaker under the Top Cover may be possible and practical. But, the 'better' "Option" with the Icom IC-R75 is simply using an External Speaker that's style and color matches the appearance of the Icom IC-R75. jm2cw ~ RHF . . = = = starman = = = wrote in message ... NOTE: The Icom IC-R75's 'exterior' Speaker Grill is very small and ONLY Measures 1.75" Wide by 2.25" High. READ Message #4360 in the "Icom IC-R75" eGroup on YAHOO ! I would be tempted to modify the R75 speaker grill and install a better internal speaker. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
"Stinger" wrote in message ...
You're on the right track. The advent of computer users having better multimedia sound cards has caused manufacturers to market some great-sounding compact self-amplified speakers. And the great news is that these speakers work extremely well with even portable radios, and are available at prices significantly lower than you would have expected to pay even a couple of years ago. I run my R-75 through Cambridge Soundworks' Henry Kloss designed Model 88 table radio. It has a subwoofer and three sound modes, "Stereo", "Wide", and "Mono", each of which provides a different listening quality to SW signals. This set-up is a vast improvement over Icom's stock speaker. The Model 88 is a superb receiver for fringe FM reception to boot, but is less than mediocre for AM broadcast band reception. Regards, Grumpus Creative Labs has teamed with Cambridge Soundworks to make some models, and the collaboration has resulted in several excellent setups for listening to shortwave radio. I've seen the 3-piece set at Wal-Mart for less than $35.00. Trust me -- you WANT a subwoofer -- your radio is producing signals that simply cannot be adequately reproduced by most table-top speakers, even in MW and SW. You'll hear depth, clarity, and ambient studio characteristics you would not be able to discern otherwise. Also, IMHO, you would have to buy a Bose Acoustic Wave to rival the sound on my ATS-909 in FM stereo using these speakers. It really sounds that good. Another plus is that they're easily switched between radios. Plug them in to your headphone jack and you're set to go (may need to get a std. to stereo mini-plug adapter for some desktops). For more permanent installations, you may want to build a simple switch to choose between radios. Happy listening! -- Stinger "Dxluver" wrote in message ... I've been thinking about removing some speakers stacks I use. One I used for the 140X and the other for the 129X, at first I really liked the sound. But since I picked up a pair of some discontinued Radio Shack Amplified Speakers (cat#40-1361) last summer at a garage sale for like ten dollars, I've kind of been thinking about asking the group it's opinion and what it is they use or what would they do if they were me? **No smart a** comments** ;-) Those amplified ones are hooked to the DX394, actually I stopped listening to that piece becasue of the sound, I tried my stacks that are hooked to my Hammarlunds, but that didn't do it. Tried other combos and that stock speaker absolutely is a crime that they even put it in there, really. But these amplified ones take four c batteries and are 'extremely' heavy for two speakers, I couldn't believe it, I felt like I stole them from that woman. But it has made the 394 "come back to life." :-) But between those and switching speakers on my scanner (BC9000XLT).....I used to use the stock but it sucks plus the way I have it configured I had to use an extension speaker. I went with the Rat Shack external speaker, I figured it was good enough. But the other day I was cleaning out the closet in the radio room ( I highly recommend it to everyone) I found stuff I forgot I even had and actually some things that I don't remember where or who I got them from. But I came up on a pair of *Aiwa* speakers that were used 'stock' ---pretty sure in an Ford Taurus. I did a little cutting and soldering and baddabing, I now have that one speaker hooked to the 9000 and WOW what a difference. On the back of the speaker it says 40w with an 8 impedance. But I'm gonna keep that setup. Should I use the other one for one of my Hammarlunds? I KNOW there is more than enough in one of those HQ's to drive one of those Aiwas, or would it sound like sh*t? I just think that the speaker/speakers I have now run into the Hammarlunds are too much and not really getting to *drive* them to their full potential. I'm no audiophile, and I know there is a few in here so I bow to the *sound Gods* on this one. Like on Steve's setup with his Drake, I saw his modest speaker. What about you Brian? You have some boatanchors like I do. Shouldn't I go smaller and get the most out of the speaker or a lot of speaker without it reaching it's potential. **Sorry for the longer than usual post, looking forward to many replies. Thanks, DX |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com