Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CW" wrote in message ... We are one of the few countries in the world that has private broadcasting. As such, the FCC realized early on that if shortwave broadcasts were allowed to be targeted to the domestic population, there would be room for relatively few stations and those would not best serve the local communities as radio stations wee intended to do. The regs. state that shortwave broadcasting stations can not target the US. That includes the religious stations. Some are braver than others about skirting the rules. The religious broadcasters are the worst about that as they can always scream religious persecution if the Feds ride them to much. The whole intent was, as I said previously, to have local, limited coverage stations so as to serve the interests of the local community. The generally limited reach of AM broadcast stations fit that role though, with the recent corporate buyup of local stations, that is not really the case anymore. Up until recently, the government took a dim view of the media (radio, TV, newspapers, ect) being controlled by just a few. This was to prevent mass propaganda and promote the dissemination of varying viewpoints. They have been deregulating this lately. Probably do to money. It's been my assumption that the established radio powers were behind the prohibition of US domestic SW broadcasting. The domestic SW programming ban limited competition. And nearly all the stations were affiliated with, or owned by one of the networks. Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Armed Forces Radio & Television Service (AFRTS) | Broadcasting | |||
Technical Question: WBCQ Vs. AFRTS | Shortwave | |||
AFRTS in Italy? | Shortwave | |||
Signal report for WBCQ tonight at 8 | Shortwave | |||
Does WBCQ have good airtime available? | Shortwave |