Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm also thinking that without a noise-bridge, my best bet is a trial and error comparison. Joe Carr sez that at less than 1 wavelength, large loops can reach a feedpoint impedance of up to 3000 ohms (I had to read it twice to make sure); but at a full wavelength or longer, it pretty much stays at around 100 ohms. Various sources show anywhere from no match needed, all the way up to a 30:1 match is needed. I think there's just too many variables to know for sure. So, trial and error it is. I'm going to try a 30:1, a 10:1 and a 1:1 toroid xformer to see what differences, if any, I can detect just with the naked "earball". In the absence of any discernable difference, I'm going to at least use the 1:1, if only to maintain the DC seperation between the antenna element and the coax. In addition to the end Z varying radically with frequency, you will also find the classic 9:1 toroidal transformer only functions as a 9:1 over a relatively narrow frequency range- whereas a binocular core will behave as a 9:1 over almost 2 decades. Somewhere here I have a network analyzer plot comparing a toroidal vs binocular transformer. -- Dale W4OP for PAR Electronics, Inc. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale Parfitt wrote:
In addition to the end Z varying radically with frequency, you will also find the classic 9:1 toroidal transformer only functions as a 9:1 over a relatively narrow frequency range- whereas a binocular core will behave as a 9:1 over almost 2 decades. Somewhere here I have a network analyzer plot comparing a toroidal vs binocular transformer. It depends a lot on the size of the transformer. You can get two decades from a tiny one made with a TV balun toroid. One trick is to keep the total length of wire in the transformer below about 5% of a wavelength at the highest frequency of interest. The antenna's Z does indeed vary a great deal, from 10's to 1000's of ohms. If you plot it in the complex plane, it makes a spiral centered at the antenna's *characteristic* Z, which for an inverted L is generally in the range of 300-700 ohms. Matching to an impedance near the center of the spiral yields a system that is not perfectly matched at any frequency, but is adequately matched over a wide range of frequencies. -jpd |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah ! But the blinking NE-2 during a thunderstorm is kinda entertaining! (I had the same brain fart) ;) it seemed like the simple loading of the antenna thru the "Balun" caused noise to drop by 50% and my station count at least doubled (but I still cant get New Zealand---I need my sleeeep!) I tested the concept first with a 300/75 tv-cable balun Yodar -=jd=- wrote: That's the method I used with the end-fed random. I had built a static bleeder to go with it, which was just silly. I experienced a mental vapor- lock and didn't recognize that the xformer provided a direct DC path to ground on it's own. It could have been that I just wanted to build something - idle hands and all... |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volker Tonn wrote:
But for sure you can not do it by yourself and it will cost a LOT. And at least there is NO insurance it will work under ALL circumstances. Best (additional) way to go is to disconnect the antenna when leaving the shack or lightning is coming up whilst you are in your shack. Not true. You have to be anal-retentive as hell to make sure that it is done right, but you can do it properly using the right equipment. Polyphaser or I.C.E. protectors do the job well, but they must be mounted on an appropriate ground window. The object of the game is not to have your equipment at ground potential; rather the object is to have the potential on all the equipment rise and fall together so there is no differential amongst the equipment. There is quite a bit of introductory material at www.polyphaser.com. Eric -- Eric F. Richards, "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there much one can do for sensitive electronics? For example, during the
summer at my QTH, late day thunderstorms are common and on one such day I did have the antenna disconnected from my Drake R-8B but a FET still managed to get fried and I needed to send the radio back to Drake for repair. Regards John Barnard "Eric F. Richards" wrote: Volker Tonn wrote: But for sure you can not do it by yourself and it will cost a LOT. And at least there is NO insurance it will work under ALL circumstances. Best (additional) way to go is to disconnect the antenna when leaving the shack or lightning is coming up whilst you are in your shack. Not true. You have to be anal-retentive as hell to make sure that it is done right, but you can do it properly using the right equipment. Polyphaser or I.C.E. protectors do the job well, but they must be mounted on an appropriate ground window. The object of the game is not to have your equipment at ground potential; rather the object is to have the potential on all the equipment rise and fall together so there is no differential amongst the equipment. There is quite a bit of introductory material at www.polyphaser.com. Eric -- Eric F. Richards, "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JB,
Three things "To Do" during Thunder and Lightening Events: 1. Dis-Connect 'all' Antennas and Ground them to the Ground Bus in your Shack. 2. Use Shorting Plugs and Wires on 'all' your Radio/Receivers Antenna Inputs. 3. Have a small 'all' Metal Foot Locker or Cabinet to place your Radios/Recivers in for Safety. iane ~ RHF .. .. = = = John Barnard wrote in message = = = ... Is there much one can do for sensitive electronics? For example, during the summer at my QTH, late day thunderstorms are common and on one such day I did have the antenna disconnected from my Drake R-8B but a FET still managed to get fried and I needed to send the radio back to Drake for repair. Regards John Barnard "Eric F. Richards" wrote: Volker Tonn wrote: But for sure you can not do it by yourself and it will cost a LOT. And at least there is NO insurance it will work under ALL circumstances. Best (additional) way to go is to disconnect the antenna when leaving the shack or lightning is coming up whilst you are in your shack. Not true. You have to be anal-retentive as hell to make sure that it is done right, but you can do it properly using the right equipment. Polyphaser or I.C.E. protectors do the job well, but they must be mounted on an appropriate ground window. The object of the game is not to have your equipment at ground potential; rather the object is to have the potential on all the equipment rise and fall together so there is no differential amongst the equipment. There is quite a bit of introductory material at www.polyphaser.com. Eric -- Eric F. Richards, "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 .. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , John Barnard
wrote: Is there much one can do for sensitive electronics? For example, during the summer at my QTH, late day thunderstorms are common and on one such day I did have the antenna disconnected from my Drake R-8B but a FET still managed to get fried and I needed to send the radio back to Drake for repair. I You do not know what happened. The radio might have been damaged before you disconnected it. Sometimes the damaged FET does not fail right away. There might have been a static charge on the antenna that blew the FET when you went to reconnect it. I consider myself very fortunate that I do not live in a lightening zone and so do not have these problems but I do not use the type of antennas most susceptible to this kind of damage. Loop antennas are the safest to use as long as you make ground contact first with the radio upon reconnection. If you use a Marconi type of antenna, be sure to use a coupling transformer that is grounded in some way to give the static charge a place to go. The damaging pulse from lightening needs some kind of clamping device. Those can be bought at the same outfits that sell antennas. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Barnard wrote:
Is there much one can do for sensitive electronics? For example, during the summer at my QTH, late day thunderstorms are common and on one such day I did have the antenna disconnected from my Drake R-8B but a FET still managed to get fried and I needed to send the radio back to Drake for repair. First off, it could have been damaged by a surge and failed later. Second off, with reputable lightning supressors such as Polyphasers, properly set up, the radio is actually safer than it is when disconnected because the supressor will crowbar (dead-short) nanoseconds after the strike starts, when the threshold voltage is reached. It remains shorted as long as current is flowing. It should be noted that a simple static discharge such as touching a doorknob and getting a spark has to be about 3000 volts before a visible spark occurs. That is way above the crowbar voltage of the Polyphasers. Regards John Barnard "Eric F. Richards" wrote: Volker Tonn wrote: But for sure you can not do it by yourself and it will cost a LOT. And at least there is NO insurance it will work under ALL circumstances. Best (additional) way to go is to disconnect the antenna when leaving the shack or lightning is coming up whilst you are in your shack. Not true. You have to be anal-retentive as hell to make sure that it is done right, but you can do it properly using the right equipment. Polyphaser or I.C.E. protectors do the job well, but they must be mounted on an appropriate ground window. The object of the game is not to have your equipment at ground potential; rather the object is to have the potential on all the equipment rise and fall together so there is no differential amongst the equipment. There is quite a bit of introductory material at www.polyphaser.com. Eric -- Eric F. Richards, "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 -- Eric F. Richards "The weird part is that I can feel productive even when I'm doomed." - Dilbert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna impedance analyzer comparison | Antenna | |||
TV antenna impedance measurements with MFJ-269. | Antenna | |||
NEW PROGRAM - Input Impedance & SWR of resonant antenna. | Homebrew | |||
NEW PROGRAM - Input Impedance & SWR of resonant antenna. | Homebrew |