Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181   Report Post  
Old February 8th 04, 05:45 PM
Michael Bryant
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: Larry Ozarow

There's lot's of people, even in this newgroup, that I respect
for having far more specialized intellect than I. You, however, are not one

of
them.


Funniest post in the whole thread. Bryant concedes that there
are people in our trailer park that might actually know more
about some limited "specialized" area than he does. Implicitly
touting his own superior general intellect in a sentence with a
grammatical error and a spelling error, no less.


Another gem from Oz. Can any of you pick out the spelling or grammatical
errors? If you can, let me know. I know Oz won't since he claimed to have
plonk'd me long ago for being an anti-Semite. In Oz' world anyone with any
opposition to Sharon and Israeli foreign policy is anti-Jewish.

By the way, look up "specialized" in any US dictionary. It's spelled
"specialised" in Britian and "specialized" in the US. Like the difference
between "colour" and "color"'. Don't you folks find it funny that Oz finds this
to be so funny when N8KDV misspells the word "too" as "to" in every post. But,
then, Oz is hardly known for his objectivity.

I am not the smatest person in this newsgroup in any sense. Is that clear
enough for you to interpret, Ozzie? I am Einstein compared to the N8KDV, our
house monkey.

Want to take any bets on how long Sharon has left? How come you aren't
entertained by a constant slew of spelling and grammer mistakes by others, Oz.
You are as transparent as glass.




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)
  #182   Report Post  
Old February 8th 04, 06:03 PM
N8KDV
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: Larry Ozarow


There's lot's of people, even in this newgroup, that I respect
for having far more specialized intellect than I. You, however, are not one

of
them.


Funniest post in the whole thread. Bryant concedes that there
are people in our trailer park that might actually know more
about some limited "specialized" area than he does. Implicitly
touting his own superior general intellect in a sentence with a
grammatical error and a spelling error, no less.


Another gem from Oz. Can any of you pick out the spelling or grammatical
errors? If you can, let me know. I know Oz won't since he claimed to have
plonk'd me long ago for being an anti-Semite. In Oz' world anyone with any
opposition to Sharon and Israeli foreign policy is anti-Jewish.

By the way, look up "specialized" in any US dictionary. It's spelled
"specialised" in Britian and "specialized" in the US. Like the difference
between "colour" and "color"'. Don't you folks find it funny that Oz finds this
to be so funny when N8KDV misspells the word "too" as "to" in every post. But,
then, Oz is hardly known for his objectivity.

I am not the smatest person in this newsgroup in any sense. Is that clear
enough for you to interpret, Ozzie? I am Einstein compared to the N8KDV, our
house monkey.


And that would make you what Bryant?



Want to take any bets on how long Sharon has left? How come you aren't
entertained by a constant slew of spelling and grammer mistakes by others, Oz.
You are as transparent as glass.

Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)


  #183   Report Post  
Old February 8th 04, 06:11 PM
N8KDV
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Michael Bryant wrote:

I am Einstein compared to the N8KDV, our
house monkey.


Einstein?

What the hell are you smoking today Bryant?

LMAO!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

  #187   Report Post  
Old February 10th 04, 05:38 AM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 17:45:04 +0000, Michael Bryant wrote:



Another gem from Oz. Can any of you pick out the spelling or grammatical
errors? If you can, let me know. I know Oz won't since he claimed to have
plonk'd me long ago for being an anti-Semite. In Oz' world anyone with any
opposition to Sharon and Israeli foreign policy is anti-Jewish.


Duh, I was talking about "There's" which should have been
"There are" and "lot's" which should have been "lots."
I put "specialized" in quotes because you used the word to
make light of other people's expertise as opposed to what
I suppose you believe to be your implicit superior "general"
intellect.

And for the record I don't think you are an antisemite.
I just think many of your political opinions, including
those about the Middle East are uninformed and knee-jerk.

Oz

  #189   Report Post  
Old February 10th 04, 01:01 PM
Ernie
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Bryant wrote:

Aren't I lucky to receive your grammar lesson? Never claimed to have perfect
grammar. But you failed to respond to my observation that my grammar and
spelling are good enough to convey what I mean or that the people I was
responding to were using far less correct grammar and spelling. And we all know
that N8KDV never displays a superior or arrogant tone, right? RHF is never
superior and never uses imprfect grammar, right? And receiving your little
lesson, as you called us a "newgroup," was particularly humorous.


Neither Steve nor RHF assert or imply that they are intellectuals as you
did. Both of them contribute more in the way of useful information than
you do, but of course that falls into the category of "specialized"
intellect. As for the word "newgroup," why are you accusing me of
that? I didn't use it on my own. It occurs in my post as a direct quote
from your preceding post! I don't comment on other people's typos.

While your grammar and spelling may be sufficient to convey your
arguments, I'm not the only one to have observed that your logic
is not. You often refuse to respond to legitimate points, pretend
the point people are responding to is something other than it was
(combining this tactic with a loss of temper), or resort to ad hominem,
reducing the argument to a slugfest.

I still don't understand this whole thing of insisting on mailing people
directly when you respond to posts of theirs,
then refusing to stop doing it when they ask, and furthermore barely
even acknowledging that you do it when people bring it up. This is the
simplest courtesy one can perform and you refuse to do it. Is your news
reader very complicated? Do you need someone to show you how to respond
only to the newsgroup? Or is it just that you are so hostile and angry
at the world that you have to just stick your finger in someone's eye
when you're arguing with him. I think most people in the group know
which of these is the reason.

Oz
  #190   Report Post  
Old February 10th 04, 01:25 PM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That was confusing. I created the "Ernie" nym to so
I could avoid this kind of stupid ****ing match. Never
did work out, so I dropped it, but accidently used it
here. Of course the post by "Ernie" quoted below is
from me - please Mike, don't think I didn't respond to
your plaintive call for attention.

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:01:00 +0000, Ernie wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

Aren't I lucky to receive your grammar lesson? Never claimed to have perfect
grammar. But you failed to respond to my observation that my grammar and
spelling are good enough to convey what I mean or that the people I was
responding to were using far less correct grammar and spelling. And we all know
that N8KDV never displays a superior or arrogant tone, right? RHF is never
superior and never uses imprfect grammar, right? And receiving your little
lesson, as you called us a "newgroup," was particularly humorous.


Neither Steve nor RHF assert or imply that they are intellectuals as you
did. Both of them contribute more in the way of useful information than
you do, but of course that falls into the category of "specialized"
intellect. As for the word "newgroup," why are you accusing me of
that? I didn't use it on my own. It occurs in my post as a direct quote
from your preceding post! I don't comment on other people's typos.

While your grammar and spelling may be sufficient to convey your
arguments, I'm not the only one to have observed that your logic
is not. You often refuse to respond to legitimate points, pretend
the point people are responding to is something other than it was
(combining this tactic with a loss of temper), or resort to ad hominem,
reducing the argument to a slugfest.

I still don't understand this whole thing of insisting on mailing people
directly when you respond to posts of theirs,
then refusing to stop doing it when they ask, and furthermore barely
even acknowledging that you do it when people bring it up. This is the
simplest courtesy one can perform and you refuse to do it. Is your news
reader very complicated? Do you need someone to show you how to respond
only to the newsgroup? Or is it just that you are so hostile and angry
at the world that you have to just stick your finger in someone's eye
when you're arguing with him. I think most people in the group know
which of these is the reason.

Oz


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calling N8KDV Maximus Shortwave 12 February 1st 04 08:13 PM
Burr and N8KDV OT Spammers Michael Bryant Shortwave 5 January 18th 04 10:13 PM
Calling N8KDV Maximus Shortwave 3 January 14th 04 03:09 AM
*PING* - N8KDV Gregg Shortwave 2 January 6th 04 06:55 AM
clandestine ? N8KDV Shortwave 15 July 28th 03 05:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017