|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Michael W. Bryant... victim yet again! Get yer hankies out! It's time for a good cry! Oh, and going to the court over an email means that weren't trying to invoke victim status??? As always, you need to look in the mirror before sending your emails. Different thread, so I'm not breaking pledges, Centurion Loser. Different thread my ass, you're a fat friggin liar Bryant, that's the bottom line! |
Michael "I'm a Fat Boy" Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Michael W. Bryant... victim yet again! Get yer hankies out! It's time for a good cry! Oh, and going to the court over an email means that weren't trying to invoke victim status??? You were so worked up Liar Boy you forgot to place a 'you' in the above sentence. Don't have a stroke fat boy! As always, you need to look in the mirror before sending your emails. How will looking in a mirror help Bong Boy? Different thread, so I'm not breaking pledges, Centurion Loser. There's that jealousy again! All this from a lyin fat boy! Michael "Bong Boy" Bryant (fake call here) Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Telamon wrote: In article , ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: Telamon lid I had you in the kill file in the past due to all the flame threads you instigated. You went through some legal problems and moved, which necessitated a change in providers and so your posts began showing up again in my reader again. Since that time you have been fairly responsible until lately so your status could change again. Sir, you are a liar. When I moved to Kentucky from Utah, I kept my ISP (AOL) and my email address. It hasn't changed since I joined AOL in 1992. These facts can be checked by anyone with enough technical expertise to check google.com. If I was plonk'd before my move, I would remain so. No you are the liar was Michael Bryant Michael Bryant Michael Bryant now Michael Bryant ojunk To be clear on the "threat" if you become annoying, boring or just not worth the time to read I don't have to see your posts in the group. The ball is in your court. Do as choose, sir, but have enough dignity not to fabricate little scenarios as you did above. I would hope that you would apply the same standards on other posters, such as N8KDV. The fact that you need to address this post to me when all i have done is give Steve a taste of his own venom says much about your own biases and prejudices. In fact, I encourage you to block me. While I respect your intelligence, I find your attitude to be so superior as to be tiring. I have no intentions of communicating any further with you. To borrow a phrase, PLONK This more of the current Bryant logic at work. You used to make intelligent posts. He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! -- Telamon Ventura, California |
From: N8KDV
He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. Liar, you said you hadn't changed addresses since 1992, you were using the other ) as late as 1995... Read your post boy... |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. Here's what you said boy! "Sir, you are a liar. When I moved to Kentucky from Utah, I kept my ISP (AOL) and my email address. It hasn't changed since I joined AOL in 1992. These facts can be checked by anyone with enough technical expertise to check google.com. If I was plonk'd before my move, I would remain so". You were still using as late as 1995... Liar! |
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:40:58 GMT, Telamon
wrote: In article , ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: Telamon lid Let's get this straight - you are condemning Steve for listening to his radios in RRS. This is more entertainment than I have a right to expect from Bryant. I'm warning him that he needs a life. It might help make him a bit more sociable. I guess it doesn't bother you when he lashed into people (not just me!) calling them morons, retards and idiots. Maybe a little social interaction might not be a bad idea for you either. I donıt care for the name calling from anyone unless they are making a joke. Iım heading out to see family after this. Good! Don't come back! Tracy |
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. Here's what you said boy! "Sir, you are a liar. When I moved to Kentucky from Utah, I kept my ISP (AOL) and my email address. It hasn't changed since I joined AOL in 1992. These facts can be checked by anyone with enough technical expertise to check google.com. If I was plonk'd before my move, I would remain so". You were still using as late as 1995... You were still using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... You were still using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995 also.... So, saying it hasn't changed since 1992 is, well it's a lie! Liar! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. You were also using: DaveAnt420 ) at least into 2001.... LOLOLOLOLOL You are a LIAR BRYANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. You were also using: DaveAnt420 ) at least into 2001.... LOLOLOLOLOL You are a LIAR BRYANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And what a ton of posts there are! LOLOLOLOLOL |
N8KDV wrote: N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. You were also using: DaveAnt420 ) at least into 2001.... LOLOLOLOLOL You are a LIAR BRYANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And what a ton of posts there are! LOLOLOLOLOL It's a treasure trove of humour! LOLOLOLOLOL! |
N8KDV wrote: N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He was indeed using in rec.radio.shortwave as late as 1995... I checked google! just as liar boy suggested! Thank you for verifying what I said, Steve. Telamon plonked me far after 1995. The address he blocked is the one i'm using now. You've not disproven anything I've said on this issue. As usual - all bluster, no relevant substance. You were also using: DaveAnt420 ) at least into 2001.... LOLOLOLOLOL You are a LIAR BRYANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And what a ton of posts there are! LOLOLOLOLOL Come on Bryant... tell us some more lies! |
Michael "fat boy" Bryant wrote: Someone forwarded me a post where Telamon accused me of being a liar by listing several other servers I used other than AOL. Nobody forwarded you jack s**t liar boy, you read it off rec.radio.shortwave! Telamon continues to lie. Really? Read below fat boy. I have been using AOL exclusively since 1997. He plonked me when I was using the AOL account. His story about me becoming unplonked because I switched servers when moving is pure, unadulterated bull****. Perhaps not servers fat boy, but you did change names did you not? Tell the truth liar boy! Telamon is not lying at all! Anyone the can use google.com can check it out. Did check it out fat boy. You're a liar! Also check out out how far back he had to go to get those earlier email addresses. Once again, you are a liar fat boy. Don't trust my words. Would never think to trust your words fat boy. Go to Google and check his lies with your own eyes. Checked, not a lie there, except for yours fat boy. Michael "fat piece of ****" Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
Michael " Bong Boy" Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Come on Bryant... tell us some more lies! Sure. Here's a lie: Yep, continuing to lie! N8KDV has some small potential of being a human being. Michael "fat piece of ****" Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Come on Bryant... tell us some more lies! Sure. Here's a lie: N8KDV has some small potential of being a human being. Michael W. Bryant has some small potential of growing up and learning how to tell the truth. My lie for today! LMAO! Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
you both need help. badly.
|
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:45:25 +0000, Michael Bryant wrote:
There's lot's of people, even in this newgroup, that I respect for having far more specialized intellect than I. You, however, are not one of them. Funniest post in the whole thread. Bryant concedes that there are people in our trailer park that might actually know more about some limited "specialized" area than he does. Implicitly touting his own superior general intellect in a sentence with a grammatical error and a spelling error, no less. Oz |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: Larry Ozarow There's lot's of people, even in this newgroup, that I respect for having far more specialized intellect than I. You, however, are not one of them. Funniest post in the whole thread. Bryant concedes that there are people in our trailer park that might actually know more about some limited "specialized" area than he does. Implicitly touting his own superior general intellect in a sentence with a grammatical error and a spelling error, no less. Another gem from Oz. Can any of you pick out the spelling or grammatical errors? If you can, let me know. I know Oz won't since he claimed to have plonk'd me long ago for being an anti-Semite. In Oz' world anyone with any opposition to Sharon and Israeli foreign policy is anti-Jewish. By the way, look up "specialized" in any US dictionary. It's spelled "specialised" in Britian and "specialized" in the US. Like the difference between "colour" and "color"'. Don't you folks find it funny that Oz finds this to be so funny when N8KDV misspells the word "too" as "to" in every post. But, then, Oz is hardly known for his objectivity. I am not the smatest person in this newsgroup in any sense. Is that clear enough for you to interpret, Ozzie? I am Einstein compared to the N8KDV, our house monkey. And that would make you what Bryant? Want to take any bets on how long Sharon has left? How come you aren't entertained by a constant slew of spelling and grammer mistakes by others, Oz. You are as transparent as glass. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: I am Einstein compared to the N8KDV, our house monkey. Einstein? What the hell are you smoking today Bryant? LMAO! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
In article ,
ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: Larry Ozarow There's lot's of people, even in this newgroup, that I respect for having far more specialized intellect than I. You, however, are not one of them. Funniest post in the whole thread. Bryant concedes that there are people in our trailer park that might actually know more about some limited "specialized" area than he does. Implicitly touting his own superior general intellect in a sentence with a grammatical error and a spelling error, no less. snip By the way, look up "specialized" in any US dictionary. It's spelled "specialised" in Britian and "specialized" in the US. Like the difference between "colour" and "color"'. Don't you folks find it funny that Oz finds this to be so funny when N8KDV misspells the word "too" as "to" in every post. But, then, Oz is hardly known for his objectivity. snip I think Larry is referring to "newgroup", which should be "newsgroup." -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: N8KDV Hopefully he'll behave! He really starts to pay attention when there is the possibility of the law getting involved, otherwise he seems to have ADD. ADD? Yep, that's entertaining coming from someone of your immense intellect!! How often do you get outside, Steve, now that you don't work anymore? Michael, Hey, I resemble that remark. I don't work anymore and I get out quite often. Mostly though to pick up bottles and cans to support my radio habit. Hey at .05 per, they add up quickly. -- 73's Rick Drake R8 R8B ICOM R75 Yaesu 7700 Hammarlund SP-600-JX-17 "If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?" |
Rick KB1KIL wrote: "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: N8KDV Hopefully he'll behave! He really starts to pay attention when there is the possibility of the law getting involved, otherwise he seems to have ADD. ADD? Yep, that's entertaining coming from someone of your immense intellect!! How often do you get outside, Steve, now that you don't work anymore? Michael, Hey, I resemble that remark. I don't work anymore and I get out quite often. Mostly though to pick up bottles and cans to support my radio habit. Hey at .05 per, they add up quickly. Hi Rick, They are .10 per here in Michigan, but it's to damn cold to stop and pick em all up! Spring is coming though! Steve Holland, MI |
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 17:45:04 +0000, Michael Bryant wrote:
Another gem from Oz. Can any of you pick out the spelling or grammatical errors? If you can, let me know. I know Oz won't since he claimed to have plonk'd me long ago for being an anti-Semite. In Oz' world anyone with any opposition to Sharon and Israeli foreign policy is anti-Jewish. Duh, I was talking about "There's" which should have been "There are" and "lot's" which should have been "lots." I put "specialized" in quotes because you used the word to make light of other people's expertise as opposed to what I suppose you believe to be your implicit superior "general" intellect. And for the record I don't think you are an antisemite. I just think many of your political opinions, including those about the Middle East are uninformed and knee-jerk. Oz |
|
Michael Bryant wrote:
Aren't I lucky to receive your grammar lesson? Never claimed to have perfect grammar. But you failed to respond to my observation that my grammar and spelling are good enough to convey what I mean or that the people I was responding to were using far less correct grammar and spelling. And we all know that N8KDV never displays a superior or arrogant tone, right? RHF is never superior and never uses imprfect grammar, right? And receiving your little lesson, as you called us a "newgroup," was particularly humorous. Neither Steve nor RHF assert or imply that they are intellectuals as you did. Both of them contribute more in the way of useful information than you do, but of course that falls into the category of "specialized" intellect. As for the word "newgroup," why are you accusing me of that? I didn't use it on my own. It occurs in my post as a direct quote from your preceding post! I don't comment on other people's typos. While your grammar and spelling may be sufficient to convey your arguments, I'm not the only one to have observed that your logic is not. You often refuse to respond to legitimate points, pretend the point people are responding to is something other than it was (combining this tactic with a loss of temper), or resort to ad hominem, reducing the argument to a slugfest. I still don't understand this whole thing of insisting on mailing people directly when you respond to posts of theirs, then refusing to stop doing it when they ask, and furthermore barely even acknowledging that you do it when people bring it up. This is the simplest courtesy one can perform and you refuse to do it. Is your news reader very complicated? Do you need someone to show you how to respond only to the newsgroup? Or is it just that you are so hostile and angry at the world that you have to just stick your finger in someone's eye when you're arguing with him. I think most people in the group know which of these is the reason. Oz |
That was confusing. I created the "Ernie" nym to so
I could avoid this kind of stupid ****ing match. Never did work out, so I dropped it, but accidently used it here. Of course the post by "Ernie" quoted below is from me - please Mike, don't think I didn't respond to your plaintive call for attention. On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:01:00 +0000, Ernie wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: Aren't I lucky to receive your grammar lesson? Never claimed to have perfect grammar. But you failed to respond to my observation that my grammar and spelling are good enough to convey what I mean or that the people I was responding to were using far less correct grammar and spelling. And we all know that N8KDV never displays a superior or arrogant tone, right? RHF is never superior and never uses imprfect grammar, right? And receiving your little lesson, as you called us a "newgroup," was particularly humorous. Neither Steve nor RHF assert or imply that they are intellectuals as you did. Both of them contribute more in the way of useful information than you do, but of course that falls into the category of "specialized" intellect. As for the word "newgroup," why are you accusing me of that? I didn't use it on my own. It occurs in my post as a direct quote from your preceding post! I don't comment on other people's typos. While your grammar and spelling may be sufficient to convey your arguments, I'm not the only one to have observed that your logic is not. You often refuse to respond to legitimate points, pretend the point people are responding to is something other than it was (combining this tactic with a loss of temper), or resort to ad hominem, reducing the argument to a slugfest. I still don't understand this whole thing of insisting on mailing people directly when you respond to posts of theirs, then refusing to stop doing it when they ask, and furthermore barely even acknowledging that you do it when people bring it up. This is the simplest courtesy one can perform and you refuse to do it. Is your news reader very complicated? Do you need someone to show you how to respond only to the newsgroup? Or is it just that you are so hostile and angry at the world that you have to just stick your finger in someone's eye when you're arguing with him. I think most people in the group know which of these is the reason. Oz |
Ernie wrote:
snip While your grammar and spelling may be sufficient to convey your arguments, I'm not the only one to have observed that your logic is not. You often refuse to respond to legitimate points, pretend the point people are responding to is something other than it was (combining this tactic with a loss of temper), or resort to ad hominem, reducing the argument to a slugfest. In a debate, "winning" is more important than finding the truth. See the following link for helpful information on logical fallacies. http://www.ncpa.org/debate2/fallacies.html snip |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com