| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
February 6th 04, 04:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#2
February 6th 04, 04:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
February 6th 04, 04:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
February 6th 04, 04:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 06 Feb 2004 04:53:33 GMT, ojunk (Michael Bryant)
wrote: From: Tracy Fort Quit stealing my snickers! Tracy You can have them back! Too many nuts... ;-o Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) You got a problem with nuts? Tracy |
|
#6
February 6th 04, 04:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: Tracy Fort
You got a problem with nuts? Only rotten ones, like yourself..... |
|
#7
February 6th 04, 05:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 06 Feb 2004 04:58:26 GMT, ojunk (Michael Bryant)
wrote: From: Tracy Fort You got a problem with nuts? Only rotten ones, like yourself..... You should give up those Horses up there in Kentucky and go back to women. I'm sure the horses would love to see you quit playing with their peni.....never mind! Tracy |
|
#8
February 6th 04, 04:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll state here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL ME AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed. However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the matter with the Circuit Court here in Michigan. Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should enjoy this comedy! Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in the first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second? I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly functioning! ;-) Ok, Steve, you got me. I don't want the coppers busting down my door. But I need an answer. You say want an email to back down and then you say you'll got the big bad judge if I do. You're just so damn trixey. What should I do.... snicker, snicker You know exactly what I mean boy. Your spelling is starting to suffer! You need some sleep! |
|
#9
February 6th 04, 06:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: N8KDV You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll state here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL ME AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed. However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the matter with the Circuit Court here in Michigan. Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should enjoy this comedy! Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in the first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second? I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly functioning! ;-) Ok, Steve, you got me. I don't want the coppers busting down my door. But I need an answer. You say want an email to back down and then you say you'll got the big bad judge if I do. You're just so damn trixey. What should I do.... snicker, snicker So what is your new nickname then, Gollum? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Calling N8KDV | Shortwave | |||
| Burr and N8KDV OT Spammers | Shortwave | |||
| Calling N8KDV | Shortwave | |||
| *PING* - N8KDV | Shortwave | |||
| clandestine ? | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
