Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In article
, "Frank Dresser" wrote: "WShoots1" wrote in message ... Ah yes. I'd forgotten all about Monitor Radio. That was a classy, informative operation. Bill, K5BY. Yes, it was. Unfortunately, it cost more than the Church wanted to spend. As I understand, attempting to run a TV operation really drained their funds quickly. They still have the Christian Science Monitor, but I haven't seen one of those papers in years. It did have a reputation for first rate journalism. No need to miss it. http://www.csmonitor.com/ -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Telamon" wrote in message ... No need to miss it. http://www.csmonitor.com/ -- Telamon Ventura, California Thanks! Looks like the Christian Science Monitor is still doing a good job. Too bad about Monitor Radio, though. Frank Dresser |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, Frank. I was going to say they had a Web version.
Bill, K5BY |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article
, "Frank Dresser" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... No need to miss it. http://www.csmonitor.com/ -- Telamon Ventura, California Thanks! Looks like the Christian Science Monitor is still doing a good job. Too bad about Monitor Radio, though. Frank Dresser Yes I also miss Monitor radio. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Telamon" wrote in message ... Yes I also miss Monitor radio. -- Telamon Ventura, California I think AFRTS and Monitor Radio each did a good job of presenting America in a way the VOA doesn't. As much as I enjoy domestic shortwave radio, I'm not sure nonamericans have the cultural backround to seperate the wheat from the chaff. Sorta like the false image "The Untouchables" gave to Chicago. Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|