The DT200V usess the earpnone cord (or a loose wire [provided] for FM
antenna.

On 4 Mar 2004 08:08:55 -0800, (Michael Salmons)
wrote:

(radiok3pi) wrote in message om...

snip

(7) Ability to go "mono" on FM to get the weaklings

This is unrelated to shortwave, technically... but since someone
brought it up, sort of... I'm looking for a radio of about the same
(pocket but a little bigger ok) sized radio that does really well with
FM. My favorite AM portable (sony icf-sw100) uses a whip for fm. i
normally have it tucked away in a pocket or backpack and deploying the
aerial when i switch to fm is unfeasible, not to mention unforgivably
nerdy. i know that some pocket radios use the headphone wire itself as
the aerial. does anyone favor a pocket fm radio for semi-fringe-area
reception, say commercial stations within about 30-40 mi? I may be
asking too much for a small radio, but you never know. just curious.

Thanks,

Michael Salmons
salmonsm @ missouri . edu


I have never found a pocket portable that pulls the AM/MW stations
like the DT-200V.

The only things I don't like about it...wish the bottom was flat, not
rounded, so it would stand up easier. Also wish it had a momentary
back light for the display.

I agree $60 is pushing the value envelope. I think I got mine
somewhere on the internet for like $45 and when they closed them out
at Radio Shack for $30. I got two in use and one in reserve for when
(if) one of them craps out.

Russ

Count me as yet another person who thinks that the DT-200T is over-rated. I
gave mine away because it just wasn't user-friendly. Now, when I go for
walks, I take my Yaesu VR-120. On it, I can listen to AM or FM if I want to,
or I can listen to about anything else on it as well. It only cost me $100
on eBay, and it even has a small ferrite bar for MW listening. No, it's not
as sensitive as a lot of radios, but it fits my hand really well and I like
the way its interface is set up.