Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's too bad the NAB doesn't get their members to back off on the modulation,
so that the signal is cleaner and interferes less with adjacent NAB members. I can't hardly use the stereo lock and AFC features on my receiver anymore. I have to detune slightly to keep an undesired station from grabbing control. As for uBC, here's the URL for a new Microbroadcasters Association (It's still mostly under construction): http://www.microbroadcasting.us For the new ones in this group, take a look at the uBC equipment available at: http://www.ramseykits.com http://www.rockymountainreliable.us 73, Bill, K5BY |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me the biggest ****er was that NPR joined the NAB in lobbying
against the LPFMs, fretting about (highly unlikely) interference, even though most of the stations would be far from their corner of the spectrum. They added a legitimizing voice to the obviously self-interested NAB. On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:19:54 GMT, "Jim Douglas" wrote: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ry_local_radio |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interesting article abot Bush's 'scanner' | Scanner | |||
Interesting BPL/Ham article in USA Today | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 Â March 5, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 Â March 5, 2004 | Dx | |||
Interesting Article on ARRL Website | Policy |