Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Douglas" wrote in message news:eU2_b.99557$uV3.576289@attbi_s51... http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ry_local_radio It's interesting that the National Association of Broadcasters is so concerned about protecting us from harmful radio interference from low power FM stations. Too bad they didn't have the same concern around 20 years ago, when so many full power stations went on to fill the FM band. Frank Dresser |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... It's interesting that the National Association of Broadcasters is so concerned about protecting us from harmful radio interference from low power FM stations. Too bad they didn't have the same concern around 20 years ago, when so many full power stations went on to fill the FM band. Any bets on how the NAB would feel if they just opened up the band to full power stations on 400KHz spacing? Bet that interference would be a non-issue under those circumstances.. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Any bets on how the NAB would feel if they just opened up the band to full power stations on 400KHz spacing? Bet that interference would be a non-issue under those circumstances.. That's a good idea! Let's double the protected radius, while we're at it. And it's so much more "planned" than just letting the excess number of unprofitable stations go dark, as they were before Congress allowed the formation of the mega-networks. Frank Dresser |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JD,
Sounds Like "Good News" ![]() Maybe Low Power FM (LPFM) will be the DXing Challenge of the Future. ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Jim Douglas" = = = wrote in message news:eU2_b.99557$uV3.576289@attbi_s51... http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ry_local_radio |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "RHF" wrote in message om... JD, Sounds Like "Good News" ![]() Maybe Low Power FM (LPFM) will be the DXing Challenge of the Future. ~ RHF . . Like the college and high school stations used to be. Around here, there used to be alot of schools with 10 watt FM transmitters. They rarely kept to a strict schedule, especially around holidays. Sometimes 10 watts of pure mono FM could be heard miles away. Then the FCC mandated all those transmitters had to be upgraded to 100watts. Many of the stations didn't bother, they just went dark. Some of the rest decided to take themselves too seriously, and start acting like minor league network stations. Actually, the one college broadcaster I can think of who made it big, Carl Amare of old time radio fame, started here at a 10 watter. I heard him play the old time radio shows many times! Frank Dresser |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ithinktheyshould have opened up a new radio band exclusively for lpfm
broadcasting. Then the full-power broadcasters wouldn't be able to use the excuse they're using now. Of course then, they would have used some other excuse. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Waterperson77" wrote in message ... Ithinktheyshould have opened up a new radio band exclusively for lpfm broadcasting. Then the full-power broadcasters wouldn't be able to use the excuse they're using now. Of course then, they would have used some other excuse. They would have had to tell the truth.... that they were afraid that something fresh, new and local would erode their listener base, and therefor their profits.. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "Waterperson77" wrote in message ... Ithinktheyshould have opened up a new radio band exclusively for lpfm broadcasting. Then the full-power broadcasters wouldn't be able to use the excuse they're using now. Of course then, they would have used some other excuse. They would have had to tell the truth.... that they were afraid that something fresh, new and local would erode their listener base, and therefor their profits.. Of course the licenses the FCC did issue, for the most part, are a total waste of spectrum space. Who really listens to garbage like TIS and garbage dump hours, or more religeous stations (seems to me there are plenty of those already on the air, including about a thousand satelators for a couple large Christian stations). |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ...
"RHF" wrote in message om... JD, Sounds Like "Good News" ![]() Maybe Low Power FM (LPFM) will be the DXing Challenge of the Future. ~ RHF . . Like the college and high school stations used to be. Around here, there used to be alot of schools with 10 watt FM transmitters. They rarely kept to a strict schedule, especially around holidays. Sometimes 10 watts of pure mono FM could be heard miles away. Then the FCC mandated all those transmitters had to be upgraded to 100watts. Many of the stations didn't bother, they just went dark. Some of the rest decided to take themselves too seriously, and start acting like minor league network stations. Actually, the one college broadcaster I can think of who made it big, Carl Amare of old time radio fame, started here at a 10 watter. I heard him play the old time radio shows many times! Frank Dresser FD, Before College Low Power FM Stations became so popular. I remember back in the day when Pacific Union College in Angwin CA had a Low Power AM Radio Station and it was quite a catch back then. ~ RHF .. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interesting article abot Bush's 'scanner' | Scanner | |||
Interesting BPL/Ham article in USA Today | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 Â March 5, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 Â March 5, 2004 | Dx | |||
Interesting Article on ARRL Website | Policy |