LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 04, 08:34 PM
Brenda Ann
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...

It's interesting that the National Association of Broadcasters is so
concerned about protecting us from harmful radio interference from low
power FM stations. Too bad they didn't have the same concern around 20
years ago, when so many full power stations went on to fill the FM band.


Any bets on how the NAB would feel if they just opened up the band to full
power stations on 400KHz spacing? Bet that interference would be a non-issue
under those circumstances..


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting article abot Bush's 'scanner' Peter Ashby Scanner 4 October 22nd 04 09:36 AM
Interesting BPL/Ham article in USA Today Steven R. Adell - KF2TI Policy 8 October 1st 04 09:02 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 ­ March 5, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 5th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 ­ March 5, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 5th 04 07:28 PM
Interesting Article on ARRL Website Bert Craig Policy 1 July 24th 03 05:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017