| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... It's interesting that the National Association of Broadcasters is so concerned about protecting us from harmful radio interference from low power FM stations. Too bad they didn't have the same concern around 20 years ago, when so many full power stations went on to fill the FM band. Any bets on how the NAB would feel if they just opened up the band to full power stations on 400KHz spacing? Bet that interference would be a non-issue under those circumstances.. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Any bets on how the NAB would feel if they just opened up the band to full power stations on 400KHz spacing? Bet that interference would be a non-issue under those circumstances.. That's a good idea! Let's double the protected radius, while we're at it. And it's so much more "planned" than just letting the excess number of unprofitable stations go dark, as they were before Congress allowed the formation of the mega-networks. Frank Dresser |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Interesting article abot Bush's 'scanner' | Scanner | |||
| Interesting BPL/Ham article in USA Today | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 Â March 5, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 Â March 5, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Interesting Article on ARRL Website | Policy | |||