LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 23rd 04, 09:57 AM
Brenda Ann
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"Waterperson77" wrote in message
...
Ithinktheyshould have opened up a new radio band exclusively for lpfm
broadcasting.

Then the full-power broadcasters wouldn't be able to use the excuse

they're
using now.

Of course then, they would have used some other excuse.


They would have had to tell the truth.... that they were afraid that
something fresh, new and local would erode their listener base, and

therefor
their profits..


Of course the licenses the FCC did issue, for the most part, are a total
waste of spectrum space. Who really listens to garbage like TIS and garbage
dump hours, or more religeous stations (seems to me there are plenty of
those already on the air, including about a thousand satelators for a couple
large Christian stations).




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting article abot Bush's 'scanner' Peter Ashby Scanner 4 October 22nd 04 09:36 AM
Interesting BPL/Ham article in USA Today Steven R. Adell - KF2TI Policy 8 October 1st 04 09:02 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 ­ March 5, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 5th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1386 ­ March 5, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 5th 04 07:28 PM
Interesting Article on ARRL Website Bert Craig Policy 1 July 24th 03 05:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017