Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Canada uses Eureka 147 DAB. It is slowly gaining an audience.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:00 GMT, "Frank Dresser" wrote: "Kevin Alfred Strom" wrote in message ... All of this destruction of the radio listening hobby -- and destruction of _anyone's_ ability to listen to many of the more distant or weaker stations he can now receive -- is because the money-men of the media monopolies saw a new digital band as a threat to their dominance. So they squelched it -- they hope -- with IBOC. As far as I know, the FCC has stopped all IBOC testing at night in order to reduce interference with other stations. As I've said before, IBOC (In-Band On-Channel) digital -- AM or FM -- is essentially a turkey, technically. It's inferior in almost every way to a dedicated digital system in a dedicated digital band. The main reason IBOC is promoted is because a new dedicated digital band would level the playing field: the present 250-Watt AM daytimer, once ensconced in the new band, would have just as clear and clean a signal as the 50-Kw clear channel or the high-power FM -- just as good fidelity, the same coverage, and 24-hour operation. Just like your Web site is as clear and as easily accessible as NBC's. Didn't the Canadians establish a new digital band? Is it being heard much? A dedicated digital band might also be scalable and allow many more channels for the listener -- hundreds, thousands perhaps. Probably enough to allow public access (in which anyone can be a broadcaster for free or nearly free) on an even greater scale than does cable television or Internet radio. And that would mean more competition for the big-money men. And it would mean that competition would now be purely on the basis of programming, not the sheer signal superiority which the money-men have paid for. They want to preserve the _inferiority_ of their smaller competitors. IBOC does that. They want to maintain the high economic hurdle to becoming a broadcaster. IBOC does that. With all good wishes, -- Kevin Alfred Strom. Well, maybe, but I don't see the entire broadcast industry rushing to IBOC. The night time ban puts a big crimp on IBOC. IBOC reduces the bandwidth and fidelity of the main channel. Also, putting all that power into sideband noise reduces the power and signal to noise ratio of the main channel. People who are annoyed by bad sounding AM radio and have yet to buy an IBOC radio are more likely to tune out. People who don't much care about fidelity, and I think that's the majority of casual listeners, won't much care for IBOC, either. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
FS: Palomar 225 | CB | |||
I also need Diy plans for a 300 watt linear | CB |