| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
March 26th 04, 01:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
ka6uup wrote in message ...
Don't believe "WG"! Join the RadioShack dx394 Group at Yahoo Groups and find out the truth. Chuck He was told the truth: The DX394 is a poor performer. Better radios can be had for about the same money, so why should he settle for an entry-level piece of junk? I'd rather have a DX398 portable than the DX394. Even with all the mods I could find it was still a poor radio. The memory scheme is completely stupid, there is awful IF bleed-through, it has lousy selectivity without replacement filters, and the audio is only tolerable. If the truth will save him some grief and money, why would you tell him otherwise? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Modified Realistic PRO 2006 Scanner, | Scanner | |||
| Modified Realistic PRO 2006 Scanner | Scanner | |||
| FS/FT Modified Radio Shack DX 398 | Shortwave | |||
| New Modified Bearcat 3000 will receive/detect everything !! | Scanner | |||
| Cell phone modified scanners | Scanner | |||
Threaded Mode
