In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: Larry Ozarow

Oh, I get it. Walsh and Cohen and Sorensen, who seem pretty
darn rich among the three of them, at least as far as I can
tell, are not the real guys behind the network. It's really
the money men of Comintern who have gone into deep cover somewhere
since the collapse of the Soviet Union and are just biding
their time till they can take over and, uh, pollute our
vital essences. Now do I have it right?

Yep, Oz, you got a pretty good vision of Telamon's world. And thanks for
keeping the repeat of his posts to a minimum - I'm trying to keep him
blocked!

Still trying to figure out how the kill file works. Must be tough.

Keep pretending to have me blocked.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: Larry Ozarow

Oh, I get it. Walsh and Cohen and Sorensen, who seem pretty
darn rich among the three of them, at least as far as I can
tell, are not the real guys behind the network. It's really
the money men of Comintern who have gone into deep cover somewhere
since the collapse of the Soviet Union and are just biding
their time till they can take over and, uh, pollute our
vital essences. Now do I have it right?

Yep, Oz, you got a pretty good vision of Telamon's world. And thanks for
keeping the repeat of his posts to a minimum - I'm trying to keep him
blocked!

Still trying to figure out how the kill file works. Must be tough.

Keep pretending to have me blocked.

Well heck! He's pretended to have a PhD, what can we expect?

"David" wrote in message
...
Bill O'reilly pays KABC $500,000 a year for his air time.

And Al Franken is from New York.

O'Reilly is syndicated by Westwood One, one of the largest such
providers in the country, and is inlarge stations all over the
country. He had advertisers. Pls. advise how much he pays WTKK,
WJFK, or KFTR, or at least provide a link indicating the financial
arrangement with KABC

Sean Hannity is #15 in New York.

So what, assuming it's true.

They too are being subsidized.

The word "subsidized" was never used, not that it matters. They
aren't on the air by the same means that Air America is--they are
there by virtue of arms length businees transactions, but it appears
that you won't get this since others have made the same point even
clearer than me.

The Washington Times has lost over a billion dollars. Yet it
continues to publish. Is this the ''free market'' at work.

Yes because a) it's Moon's own money, and b) he hasn't run out of it
yet.

Let's not get all high and mighty here. Giant corporations fill the
airwaves with simple-minded extreme right-wing broadcasters in order
to keep their favorite whores in office.

I promise to stop being "high and mighty" if you stop using inaccurate
and nonsensical cliches better suited for junior high school. Deal?

Telamon wrote:

And...

"A separate arm, called Equal Time, which has $30m in debt capacity,
will acquire and operate radio stations. The group expects to lose money
in its first two years and become profitable early in its third."

You don't want to know who these people are stay ignorant then. Don't
mock me for wanting to know Jerk.


I just figured it out. Of course you are right. Kerry is the Manchurian
Candidate. He runs for president with the secret backing of the Commies,
cleverly laundered through Air America and Equal Time, doing an end
around campaign spending limits, just as you say. In a gesture of
bi-partisanship, who is his VP candidate? Why of course, John McCain.
And there it is plain as the nose on your face! McCain was as we all
know a POW in Vietnam and was brainwashed and is just a ticking bomb.
Kerry/McCain get elected thanks to the "useful idiots" of the American
left, Kerry gets assassinated and bingo, Hanoi John McCain becomes
the first Communist president of the USA. HoHoHo Chi Minh is pulling
the strings! Do I get my Robert Welch junior space cadet medal now?

Michael,

Telamon does come across as reasonable sometimes, and
I forgot about his more comical Birchite tendencies. Had
I remembered, I wouldn't have prodded him.

As for the Jesus thing, it was Steve who denied he
existed. I don't doubt it at all. I just didn't think
any of the sources you cited constituted actual
disinterested third party evidence. Even the
synoptic gospels are generally assumed to be second-hand
as far as I know. I don't think the absence of independent
corroboration weighs in too heavily against his having
existed, since there was probably a lot of similar ferment
going on in Judea at the time that we don't have any record
of.

I will give you some push-back on the whole Messiah issue,
though :)

Oz


Michael Bryant wrote:
From: Larry Ozarow


Oh, I get it. Walsh and Cohen and Sorensen, who seem pretty
darn rich among the three of them, at least as far as I can
tell, are not the real guys behind the network. It's really
the money men of Comintern who have gone into deep cover somewhere
since the collapse of the Soviet Union and are just biding
their time till they can take over and, uh, pollute our
vital essences. Now do I have it right?


Yep, Oz, you got a pretty good vision of Telamon's world. And thanks for
keeping the repeat of his posts to a minimum - I'm trying to keep him blocked!
;-)

And why is it so hard to get a Jew to even admit that Jesus once lived?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

In article ,
N8KDV wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: Larry Ozarow

Oh, I get it. Walsh and Cohen and Sorensen, who seem pretty
darn rich among the three of them, at least as far as I can
tell, are not the real guys behind the network. It's really
the money men of Comintern who have gone into deep cover somewhere
since the collapse of the Soviet Union and are just biding
their time till they can take over and, uh, pollute our
vital essences. Now do I have it right?

Yep, Oz, you got a pretty good vision of Telamon's world. And thanks for
keeping the repeat of his posts to a minimum - I'm trying to keep him
blocked!

Still trying to figure out how the kill file works. Must be tough.

Keep pretending to have me blocked.

Well heck! He's pretended to have a PhD, what can we expect?

He may not have a PhD but he's got a P.H.D.

Maybe he will be awarded an honorary PhD if he figures out how to use a
kill file.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
Larry Ozarow wrote:

Telamon wrote:

And...

"A separate arm, called Equal Time, which has $30m in debt capacity,
will acquire and operate radio stations. The group expects to lose money
in its first two years and become profitable early in its third."

You don't want to know who these people are stay ignorant then. Don't
mock me for wanting to know Jerk.


I just figured it out. Of course you are right. Kerry is the Manchurian
Candidate.

snip

Go ahead and make fun of it loser.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"longwave" wrote in message
...
Stinger wrote:

Gosh, Les... I'm SURE you'll be missed. Don't forget not to write.

Nice double negative.



In this case, the grammar is correct as a syntax trick, as per Paul Harvey's
common usage, "We're not doing nothing about the war on drugs," and etc. (as
he gives an example of what we're doing on the war on drugs, etc.)

-- Stinger

Telamon wrote:


Sorry you look like an idiot but why address the resident prime Troll
instead of the issue you raised with what I stated.

The communists haven't taken over yet, so I can address whoever I want
at least for the time being. You didn't raise any issues, you the
claimed that Air America is being backed by the commies. If right-
wing businessmen can back rightwing talk radio, it seems fair to me
that leftwing businessmen can back leftwing talk radio. If it's a
plot when leftists do it, why isn't it a plot when rightwingers do it?
That's free speech. That's the American way of doing things, no?
We have a Republican president, two majority Republican houses of
Congress, a majority Republican-appointed Supreme Court, and as we now
know who have been following these threads, 14 million people listen
to Rush Limbaugh on a regular basis. I think you can lower the shotgun.

The problem you are having is not that I have any "Birchite tendencies"
but that you are wrong. Living in ignorance is a choice you made. Don't
blame me.


No Telamon, the problem is that you are wrong. It is not anti-American
to speak out against the policies of the US government if you disagree
with them. You want to think that people who don't like George Bush are
in the employ of the forces of darkness, that's fine with me. You want
to keep your set tuned to the instant replays of the great twilight
struggle between the superpowers, that's fine too. If I'm wrong maybe
they'll be confiscating our modems and radios next winter. We'll compare
notes then.

Stinger wrote:
"longwave" wrote in message



In this case, the grammar is correct as a syntax trick, as per Paul Harvey's
common usage, "We're not doing nothing about the war on drugs," and etc. (as
he gives an example of what we're doing on the war on drugs, etc.)

-- Stinger



Reminds me of a story about an professor at the school
I went to. Maybe it's apocryphal -

He was sitting in the back in someone else's
class, and the other guy said it was interesting that a
double negative makes a positive, but a double positive
doesn't make a negative, and he called out from the
back "Yeah, yeah!"