MWB,

YES - That is True.

Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's,
and... unto God the things that are God's
http://www.bartleby.com/59/1/renderuntoca.html
http://jeffrey.henning.com/renderuntocaesar.htm
GRAPHIC= http://www.terpsboy.com/terpsboyarchives/000046.html
http://aibi.gospelcom.net/eternity/eternity135.htm

The Truth Shall Set You Free ~ RHF
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "Stinger"

Jesus never advocated "taking." He advocated "giving."

He also advocated paying your taxes.

He advocated helping the needy.



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

..

= = = "Stinger" wrote in message
= = = ...
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
But that is exactly what they are. They advocate taking from those who
have,
and
giving to those who have not.


So Jesus was a socialist?

No.

Jesus never advocated "taking." He advocated "giving."

-- Stinger

STINGER,

Yes - NOT Taking - But Sharing and Giving

Sharing and Giving:
With a Good Heart and Open Hand {Without Reservation}
http://www.keithchandler.com/Fenelon.html

The Truth Shall Set You Free ~ RHF

..

N8KDV,

Render Your Taxes
.. . . and RENDER YOUR VOTE
To Replace those who would Tax You to Excess.

~ RHF
..
..
= = = N8KDV wrote in message
= = = ...
Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Stinger"

Jesus never advocated "taking." He advocated "giving."

He also advocated paying your taxes.

So in other words, if some government entity taxes the crap out of us we
should just pay it because your 'mythical figure' Jesus said so?

Give me a break Fat Boy.

He advocated helping the needy.

Nothing wrong with that Fat Boy... that's just something any good human
being does, regardless of 'Jesus'.

..

In article ,
Larry Ozarow wrote:

Telamon wrote:


They are defiantly anti capitalistic and are communist. Don't worry
about Franken or what he says worry about what the people
supporting this effort want.

I want to find out who these "wealthy individuals" are. I'll bet
they are communists.

Air America Radio web site: http://www.airamericaradio.com/


It's childish to tar people with whom you disagree with nasty labels.
Do you really think these people are communists? Do you know what a
communist is? This is just as stupid as calling William Buckley or
Rush Limbaugh fascists.

There are people of both the left and the right who believe in
democracy and capitalism. If you are going to disagree with someone's
position, attack the position, don't just call names.

If you have decided to be childish about this that is your problem. I
don't see you providing any links or information just calling names. I
did some research and drew some conclusions about the very strong
anti-capitalist statements made by the CEO of Air America. The fact
that the people that finance this effort are hidden from view raises
suspicions. The ideological terminology used in places on the web site
is communist.

Now I'll joint you and call you a head in the sand dwelling imbecile. No
make that an easily manipulated head in the sand dwelling imbecile.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

RHF wrote:

N8KDV,

Render Your Taxes
. . . and RENDER YOUR VOTE
To Replace those who would Tax You to Excess.

Looking forward to the election RHF... wish it were today. I think most people
have already decided who they'll vote for.

What the hell are you talking about? The names and
vitae of the principles are all on the web-site. Those
at the top are business people with backgrounds in
media. I will sound like Randi Rhodes here - They
are freaking businessmen! Not communists or entertainers
like Ed Asner or Jane Fonda, or heirs or heiresses. They
are people who made their money by being capitalists. If
you think there are commies hiding under the bed, then
give some evidence for it. And could you be more specific
about the "ideological terminology" on the web site that
you've identified as communist?


Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Larry Ozarow wrote:


Telamon wrote:
call names.


If you have decided to be childish about this that is your problem. I
don't see you providing any links or information just calling names. I
did some research and drew some conclusions about the very strong
anti-capitalist statements made by the CEO of Air America. The fact
that the people that finance this effort are hidden from view raises
suspicions. The ideological terminology used in places on the web site
is communist.

Now I'll joint you and call you a head in the sand dwelling imbecile. No
make that an easily manipulated head in the sand dwelling imbecile.

In article ,
Larry Ozarow wrote:

What the hell are you talking about? The names and
vitae of the principles are all on the web-site. Those
at the top are business people with backgrounds in
media. I will sound like Randi Rhodes here - They
are freaking businessmen! Not communists or entertainers
like Ed Asner or Jane Fonda, or heirs or heiresses. They
are people who made their money by being capitalists. If
you think there are commies hiding under the bed, then
give some evidence for it. And could you be more specific
about the "ideological terminology" on the web site that
you've identified as communist?

First I must apologize to you for the name calling. I had no idea you so
easily misdirected. The peoples names you read on the Air America web
site are the employees of the broadcast company. Nowhere can you find
the names of the people providing the 30 million dollars over 3 years
before any profit is realized. It's the people that have financed this
operation that may be communist.

Apparently this is the plan to do an end run around the latest campaign
finance reform rules by Democrats, socialists and communists to equalize
the perceived advantage of advertising driven "right wing radio."

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Larry Ozarow wrote:


Telamon wrote:
call names.


If you have decided to be childish about this that is your problem. I
don't see you providing any links or information just calling names. I
did some research and drew some conclusions about the very strong
anti-capitalist statements made by the CEO of Air America. The fact
that the people that finance this effort are hidden from view raises
suspicions. The ideological terminology used in places on the web site
is communist.

Now I'll joint you and call you a head in the sand dwelling imbecile. No
make that an easily manipulated head in the sand dwelling imbecile.


--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Mister FixIt,

People naturally gravitate to what they like and are entertained by...

This is why most of AM/FM Radio is Music Programming.
Pick: Jazz, Classical, Latin, C&W, Pop, Hip-Hop, whatever.
Advertisers who feel or know that these Audience Groups
would be interested in their products use these Music
Programs to 'reach' people who are most likely "Buy" their
Products.
* Most of the times the Music Program Advertisers use "CANNED" ADs.


This also holds true for "News & Talk" Radio Programming.
Some 'people' naturally gravitate to Talk Radio because it is what they
like and are entertained by... The Audience Makes the Choice [.]

Many of the News & Talk Radio Program Advertisers use ADs
that 'feature' the Talk Radio Personality.
WHY - Because the Audience has a 'relationship' with the
News & Talk Radio Personality and a Bond of Trust with them.
* Its Sell More Products when the Radio Personality
makes the Sales Pitch.
* Paul Harvey is one News & Talk Radio Personality that
comes to mind who does many of his own programming ADs.


mkia ~ RHF
..
..
= = = Mister Fixit wrote in message
= = = . ..
On 03 Apr 2004 18:06:25 GMT, (Llgpt) wrote:

And Limbaugh's and Hannity's aren't being bankrolled by wealthy Republicans? I
refrain from using the conservative word, as the majority of republicans are
not conservative.

Just wondering.................

Les

Limbaugh and Hannity are "Bankrolled" by companys that buy advertising
time during their programs. They buy these ad times because millions
of people listen to these show daily.

However, about 60% of the successful businesses in the US are owned or
operated by Republicans, so I suppose you could say they are
bankrolled by Republicans. If there is such a thing as a smart
Democrat Businessperson, they would also be wise to advertise to such
a large audience.

..

Telamon wrote:
y. Nowhere can you find
the names of the people providing the 30 million dollars over 3 years
before any profit is realized. It's the people that have financed this
operation that may be communist.


Oh, I get it. Walsh and Cohen and Sorensen, who seem pretty
darn rich among the three of them, at least as far as I can
tell, are not the real guys behind the network. It's really
the money men of Comintern who have gone into deep cover somewhere
since the collapse of the Soviet Union and are just biding
their time till they can take over and, uh, pollute our
vital essences. Now do I have it right?

From: Larry Ozarow

Oh, I get it. Walsh and Cohen and Sorensen, who seem pretty
darn rich among the three of them, at least as far as I can
tell, are not the real guys behind the network. It's really
the money men of Comintern who have gone into deep cover somewhere
since the collapse of the Soviet Union and are just biding
their time till they can take over and, uh, pollute our
vital essences. Now do I have it right?

Yep, Oz, you got a pretty good vision of Telamon's world. And thanks for
keeping the repeat of his posts to a minimum - I'm trying to keep him blocked!
;-)

And why is it so hard to get a Jew to even admit that Jesus once lived?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)