LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #39   Report Post  
Old April 8th 04, 11:26 PM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark Zenier" wrote in message
om...

The Supreme Court threw it out, around 1987. Not because it was
against the Constitution, but because it was done by the FCC and
exceeded the bounds of their enabling legislation. A fair minded
Congresscould reinstate it. (Sigh, fat chance ...)

I hope the fairness doctrine won't be reinstated, and I think it's less
likely now that there's a Democratic biased talk network.

I can see why alot of politicans might prefer using a group of bureaucrats
and judges to keep radio stations in line, rather than leaving it to popular
choice. After all, they have a better chance of cutting deals that way.

And this isn't a liberal vs. conservative issue. The Nixon administration
was talking about using the fairness doctrine to go after licenses of
stations owned by CBS and the Washington Post.

Frank Dresser


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Understanding Shortwave Radio Listening and Antenna Design and Construction RHF Shortwave 3 February 13th 04 07:16 AM
I wonder... mike Shortwave 8 September 5th 03 04:38 AM
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? Joe S. Shortwave 2 July 18th 03 04:50 AM
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? Dxing Since 1957 Shortwave 0 July 4th 03 05:37 PM
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? LLOYD DAVIES N0VFP General 0 July 4th 03 04:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017