| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#32
April 9th 04, 10:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Bryant wrote: From: (the captain) wrong on all counts (Michael Bryant) wrote in message ... Sat 800 Problems: 1. Obviously a good receiver for program listening, but not sensitive enough for anything approaching DX. 2. Gigantic size and weight makes it unwieldy. 3. Bandscanning hampered by digital hash from the display. 4. Low-level AC hum in audio overwhelms DX. 5. Requires 6 D batteries and will drain them in three hours. I've ended up listening to my DX398 more than the SAT800. Much prefer my old Sony 6800W to the 800. How can I be wrong??? Am I deliberately lying to keep myself from being able to sell my radio? Wow. Why am I wrong? Because you're always wrong, wrong, wrong Fat Boy! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC refuses to censor satellite radio | Broadcasting | |||
| Satellite radio's new gadgets? | Broadcasting | |||
| US satellite radio - defection to satellite radio may elevate medium | Broadcasting | |||
| US satellite radio pins hopes on women, cars | Broadcasting | |||
| Sirius satellite gets NFL football | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
