Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message Check out the current generation of Watkins-Johnson gear. Demodulation is done with DSP, after digitizing the IF. Sensitivity is a little bit better than the R-390, and selectivity is just as good as the Collins mechanical filters, but with much less ringing and audible artifacts. Also there is an optional panadaptor system that will identify modulation modes and make some attempt at identifying signals, putting this information on the screen beside each peak. Comparing the system with my R-390, it is definitely a step up in convenience and sound quality although weak signal performance really isn't any better. Probably available for under half a million bucks although it may be considered a military supply item and require a lot of paperwork. There are some okay commercial communications receivers... check the front section of the WRTH for some info. The big JRC unit is reasonable, though not as clean as the R-390. The R-390 is also one of the quietest radios ever made. You get a lot of bang for the buck with an R-390. I've heard stuff on the one I used to have that the modern gear next to it struggled with. I would agree its the best tube rig ever. I've made a couple hot rod SP-600s that were hard to beat also. I wouldn't go more than $150 on an average BC-348. There very common. Scott's right about the performance. There just a fun little rig. There one of the first BAs I worked on when I was a kid. You could pic em up at the Army surplus for around $25 -- 73 Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Hill wrote:
The R-390 is also one of the quietest radios ever made. You get a lot of bang for the buck with an R-390. I've heard stuff on the one I used to have that the modern gear next to it struggled with. I would agree its the best tube rig ever. I've made a couple hot rod SP-600s that were hard to beat also. That is where the weak signal performance comes from. It's not just the extreme selectivity of the mechanical filters, it's also from the VERY low noise PTO design. It's hard to match that with a modern PLL circuit. It can be done... low phase noise PLL systems are out there... but it is very expensive. Probably as expensive as the original Collins PTO was. I wouldn't go more than $150 on an average BC-348. There very common. Scott's right about the performance. There just a fun little rig. There one of the first BAs I worked on when I was a kid. You could pic em up at the Army surplus for around $25 If you want to listen to the BBC, though, they are hard to beat. Excellent sound quality on shortwave. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message If you want to listen to the BBC, though, they are hard to beat. Excellent sound quality on shortwave. --scott Yea they are easy to listen to. -- 73 Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
KTRH Houston drops afternoon News Block | Broadcasting | |||
afternoon at AWA museum | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Drake R-4C (proceeds support our museum) | Boatanchors | |||
All HF bands are dead, wed afternoon NJ USA | Dx | |||
VNG to go to a museum | Shortwave |