My post was misspelled. It should have read:

zSince when is "being handsome" a "requirement" for getting a ham radio
liscence.

And I wanted to add that I know that not all ham radio operators are retards
like my local ham radio operators are.

Nah, I shouldn't say that. Because that's an insult to people who really are
retarded, and I don't want to insult them. They don't deserve that kind of
insult.

However, my local ham radio operators really do deserve insults aimed at them.
for the previously mentioned reasons among others.

On 07 May 2004 04:13:48 GMT, (Mediaguy500)
wrote:

My post was misspelled. It should have read:

zSince when is "being handsome" a "requirement" for getting a ham radio
liscence.

And I wanted to add that I know that not all ham radio operators are retards
like my local ham radio operators are.

Nah, I shouldn't say that. Because that's an insult to people who really are
retarded, and I don't want to insult them. They don't deserve that kind of
insult.

However, my local ham radio operators really do deserve insults aimed at them.
for the previously mentioned reasons among others.





Maybe they thought you were Bryant!

Tracy

Maybe they thought you were Bryant!


actually, I was, in a way!!! I used to use webtv, and the webtv IP pathway
adress always had the word "bryant" in it!!



..

Mediaguy500 wrote:

My post was misspelled. It should have read:

zSince when is "being handsome" a "requirement" for getting a ham radio
liscence.

In lieu of being able to spell license, one must be handsome to get a ham radio
ticket.

In lieu of being able to spell license, one must be handsome to get a ham
radio
ticket.


actually, I didn't say that. I said that THEY said that.