LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old May 8th 04, 08:47 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's what I thought.

On 8 May 2004 10:25:51 -0700, (RHF) wrote:

= = = David wrote in message
= = = . ..

Prove it.


DR,

I have nothing to prove - But You may have Somethng to Learn.

The Proof is a matter of Public Record.

Do Your Own Research {Look It Up For Yourself}

~ RHF
.
.

On 8 May 2004 00:43:10 -0700,
(RHF) wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ...
m II wrote:

Mark S. Holden wrote:

David wrote:

Most of them are Vietnam vets that Reagan put out on the street.



Actually, a huge percentage of them are people who used to be (or should be) in mental health facilities.

The problem is in the name of compassion, laws were passed to give people who really aren't capable of making rational decisions the right to sign themselves out and live on the street.

There are exceptions - especially if there are clear signs the person is a danger to themselves or the community, but apparently living on the street is looked at as a lifestyle choice.


There seems to be a problem here with the way the police treat
schizophrenics on the street. A lot of education is in order.
Many of those homeless are ill and wind up getting jailed or shot.

http://members.fortunecity.com/bruta...ada/names.html
================================================== =====

This study claims that between 30 to 35 percent of homeless are mentally
ill.

http://www.schizophrenia.ca/call2act.pdf
================================================== =====

mike

I realize it's a delicate problem, but really, the people who
changed the laws in the name of patients rights did them a disservice.

The stigma of mental illness is certainly a problem, and some of
that can be handled with education, but if the mind is playing
tricks on someone, they can become a danger to others, and the
police may need to take action.

MSH,

In the 1970's the Courts {Activist Judges} determined that once
a Patient has Received Treatment and has their Medical Problem
'under control'. That the Patient was in-fact "Medically Well"
{Healthy} and 'had to be released' and Return to Society (the Streets).
What the Courts could not Mandate {Require} was that the Patient
'keep taking' their Medications once the Patient was in Society
(on the Streets) again. The Cycle repeats itself and usually
spirals down over time and someone dies.

~ RHF

.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews CB 0 September 24th 04 05:55 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 June 16th 04 11:30 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 08:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017