Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No ****. Do you think or just flame?
"Arthur Harris" wrote in message t... On the other hand, Mars is about 35 million miles away! You'd need a LOT more power and antenna gain to contact Mars. Art N2AH |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CW" wrote: No ****. Do you think or just flame? "Arthur Harris" wrote in message t... On the other hand, Mars is about 35 million miles away! You'd need a LOT more power and antenna gain to contact Mars. Take it easy! You're the one who claimed signals in space "go on virtually forever." Art N2AH |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Arthur Harris wrote: "CW" wrote: No ****. Do you think or just flame? "Arthur Harris" wrote in message t... On the other hand, Mars is about 35 million miles away! You'd need a LOT more power and antenna gain to contact Mars. Take it easy! You're the one who claimed signals in space "go on virtually forever." To the best of my knowledge signals in space DO go on virtually forever. Elsewise what would be the point of looking for life via the search for signals from deep in space. A project that has been ongoing for some time. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting how my original post about the Military Affiliate Radio System
turned into a discussion on communications in space. Interesting stuff! This is a very lively group. And thanks all for avoiding any discussion of signals radiating from Uranus! Greg |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Settie's (sp?) got that covered.
"Greg" wrote in message ... Interesting how my original post about the Military Affiliate Radio System turned into a discussion on communications in space. Interesting stuff! This is a very lively group. And thanks all for avoiding any discussion of signals radiating from Uranus! Greg |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty much. The real limiting factor is how much they spread out over
distance. "N8KDV" wrote in message ... To the best of my knowledge signals in space DO go on virtually forever. Elsewise what would be the point of looking for life via the search for signals from deep in space. A project that has been ongoing for some time. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CW" wrote in message ... Settie's (sp?) got that covered. SETI? The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence? They aren't looking in the solar system. They are trying to find signals which might indicate intelligence in solar systems far away. Some of the Art Bell types say SETI is a diversionary tactic to keep us from finding out the Aliens are here right now. Signals from Uranus would be heard by Radio Astronomers. Well, heard by the Radio Astronomers who aren't aware that there's a Government-Alien space program which flies regular missions to the Martian bases. Frank Dresser |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arthur Harris wrote:
"CW" wrote: Very little power is necessary in space. I had a QSO with an astronaut on MIR with a 3 watt ht. With nothing in the way, it will go on virtually forever. The signal will decrease by 6 dB every time you double the distance. MIR was about 250 miles above Earth, and you could establish communicaion with fairly low power when it was overhead. On the other hand, Mars is about 35 million miles away! You'd need a LOT more power and antenna gain to contact Mars. Art N2AH Voyager 1 is just over 90 Astronomical Units or 8.4 billion miles from the sun, transmitting with approximately 2 watts and signals are still being received here on earth. How do you account for that? |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JJ wrote:
Voyager 1 is just over 90 Astronomical Units or 8.4 billion miles from the sun, transmitting with approximately 2 watts and signals are still being received here on earth. How do you account for that? Inspired design, careful implementation, meticulous attention to nit-picky details, enormous antennas, cryogenic cooling of the receiver front ends, and 65535-bit-long GOLD codes sent straight-up for "1" and inverted for "0". It's amazing what can be pulled out from under the noise floor when only (50% of the sequence)+1 bits need to be received correctly to achieve unambigous decoding. -- Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration. (Stan Kelly-Bootle) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Attention MARS & Ex MARS Operators | Policy | |||
What is the deal with the MARS stuff? | Policy | |||
Attention MARS & Ex MARS Operators | Antenna | |||
Attention MARS & Ex MARS Operators | Dx | |||
Attention MARS & ex MARS Operators | Boatanchors |