Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
if
people are choosing AM radios based only on price, then they are likely getting poor radios. If most people don't notice the difference between a good radio an I don't thimk that's the problem. Even the expensive AM/FM radios made today sem to not be able to pick up AM anywhere near as well as the old ones. I would call all of the modern AM radios I have seen very very very poor at picking up radio signals in the AM broadcast band, although good at picking up signals in the FM broadcast band. I have come to the conclusion (my opinion) that the real reason today's AM radios are so poor as compred to the old ones of the 70's and earlier is that today's manufacturerrs think that AM isn't popular, so why bother making it pick up AM good? FM is the popular band. Well, they're right that FM is the popular band, and that AM isn't popular anymore like it was in the early 70's and before. But to me, that still isn't any excuse to make cheap radios. In my opinion, IF a radio is sold as covering the AM band, then it SHOULD be able to pick up the AM band good. But unfortunately, that's not the case. In my opinion, if you want good AM reception, you're probably better off going with an old radio manufactured in the early 1970's or before. Somewhere in the 1970's (1975?), FM first gained popularity over AM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cambridge Soundworks CD740 Radio - Reception Questions ???? | Broadcasting | |||
Sangean, best FM reception: DT-110, DT-200V, or DT-300VW? | Shortwave | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |