Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Meloche" wrote in message ... In many, many applications today where an AM tuner is included (a low-priced stereo reciever is a good example) the AM circuitry is not even as good as the better "pocket" transistor radios of the 1960's. The designer's view is: "Hey, they aren't buying a stereo rceiver to listen to AM, fercryinoutloud!" - and they save some nickles there. The difference between a workable AM circuit and a really *good* AM circuit is the width of the Grand Canyon. Huh. That's got me wondering if one or more of the suppliers has come up with a cheap, crummy AM section. Generally, I don't expect most of the manufacturers to do much design. They like to use as many industry standard parts as possible. If the crummy AM section becomes the industry standard part, it will greately drive down the manufacturing volume of the better part, even if there's only a nickel's difference at the start. Back in the AA5 days, there was a AA4 which didn't use an IF amplifier tube or a second IF transformer. They were around, but they were known poor performers and not very popular. Another possibility is poor alignment, especially with ceramic filters. Inexpensive ceramic filters might not fall exactly on their nominal frequency. I have a Realistic DX-100 like that. I suppose it was factory aligned at 455 kHz, but the IF had a double peak. I realigned it to the center frequency of the ceramic filter and the adjacent channel rejection got much better and the sensitivity went up. Doing a careful alignment takes a little extra time but the manufacturers hate that sort of thing, especially on assembly lines. I noticed Doug Smith's post on the increase in noise and interference. Those are important points and he's right. Agreed. What modern (new or used) AM radio can I buy that can pull in distant stations? I have a Realistic DX440, which does a good job. Others have tried and like the GE superradio and CC radio. The GE is much less expensive. SuperRadio III is a very good AMDX machine, but the dial pointer is certainly not the last word in accuracy. Still, with a good longwire, or even a select-a-tenna, it gives excellent performance. My AMDX log from my shack here in SW Michigan is 112 verified stations so far with the Superadio III, and I'm not done covering the bands from all directions yet. Tony Just have to count those 10kHz steps, especially if you're DXing in the dark! Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cambridge Soundworks CD740 Radio - Reception Questions ???? | Broadcasting | |||
Sangean, best FM reception: DT-110, DT-200V, or DT-300VW? | Shortwave | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |