Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "MnMikew" In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to defer the answer by striking back with your own less precisely-defined notion of a neo-conservative. SOP for Bryant. When confronted with a question he can't or dosen't want to answer, he iqnores you. You need to read. I think I've done a fairly good job of defining neo-cons over the past 12 hours. Far more effort than you've put into defining what's meant by the phrase "liberal." In the interest of good will, peace and world harmony, I was going to move on from this discussion. But I just can't now. Here's you on neo-con: "Neo is a prefix meaning 'near.'" So you think you're doing "fairly good job of defining neo-cons" when you don't even know what the blankety blank word literally means? It does -not- refer to "near conservatives." It primarily refers, once again, to a group of former liberals (the political writer Norman Podhoretz, for one) who began to reassess their positions in the '70s and '80s and became "new conservatives." The word has since been expanded to include certain others who have been strongly influenced by those individuals. I really wouldn't have belabored this if you didn't seem so firmly convinced that you have a grip on this when you don't. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael 'I'm baaaaad, I'm mega-wide' Bryant wrote: From: "T. Early" Neo is a prefix meaning 'near.'" So you think you're doing "fairly good job of defining neo-cons" when you don't even know what the blankety blank word literally means? It does -not- refer to "near conservatives." So, what's your spin on the word neo-natal? Look up the prefix "neo", genius. It primarily refers, once again, to a group of former liberals (the political writer Norman Podhoretz, for one) who began to reassess their positions in the '70s and '80s and became "new conservatives." The word has since been expanded to include certain others who have been strongly influenced by those individuals. I really wouldn't have belabored this if you didn't seem so firmly convinced that you have a grip on this when you don't. So what have you proven? The neo-cons really are something different from traditional conservatives. Thank you. You just admitted my original point. You are just sooo smart! And you are just sooo stupid! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "MnMikew" In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to defer the answer by striking back with your own less precisely-defined notion of a neo-conservative. SOP for Bryant. When confronted with a question he can't or dosen't want to answer, he iqnores you. You need to read. I think I've done a fairly good job of defining neo-cons over the past 12 hours. Far more effort than you've put into defining what's meant by the phrase "liberal." That's your opinion. I'm still waiting for some proof that anyone in the Administration attacked Kerry on his Vietnam service. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MnMikew" wrote in message ... "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "MnMikew" In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to defer the answer by striking back with your own less precisely-defined notion of a neo-conservative. SOP for Bryant. When confronted with a question he can't or dosen't want to answer, he iqnores you. You need to read. I think I've done a fairly good job of defining neo-cons over the past 12 hours. Far more effort than you've put into defining what's meant by the phrase "liberal." That's your opinion. I'm still waiting for some proof that anyone in the Administration attacked Kerry on his Vietnam service. Hey me too. That whopper goes back awhile! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | General | |||
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | Scanner | |||
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | Shortwave |