Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
starman ) writes: I was thinking of a superhet with a single gang cap' to tune the oscillator and no front-end preselection tuning, which would require another gang on the cap'. If they make them, they are going to be rare. If you don't have front end tuning, the receiver is going to overload on strong signals. If the IF is too low compared to the signal frequency, you also will never know which signal you are receiving is the one you want, and the image frequency that you don't want. If you've got a receiver with a low IF frequency, but front end tuning not ganged to the local oscillator tuning, you may be able to null out the image frequency, but you will have to keep adjusting both knobs. It would be easy to mistune the front end tuning, and tune in the image frequency. That's why all receivers have ganged tuning, at least after it was invented decades ago. If the IF is higher in frequency, of course one can use other techniques. Put the IF in the HF range, and the image response will be MHz away, and the front end will not need constant tuning. That lead to the separate front end tuning in the sixties, where it only needed peaking every so often. For limited range receivers, such as for only the ham bands, a suitably high IF could mean that one could use bandpass filters at the front end, ie they tuned a fixed 500KHz or so segment, and did not need tuning as you crossed the band. Or put the IF above the shortwave frequencies, and you have more leeway. There, the image frequency is the other side of the IF, so one could use a low pass filter, with a cut-off of 30MHz, though that still means the active stages before the first IF filter see a 30MHz range of frequencies, which may lead to overloading. At least some receivers, once first IFs went that high, allowed for a low pass filter and some sort of preselection, so you could choose. Michael The most common tube type AM radios (5-tubes) used a two gang tuning cap' for the front-end tuning and oscillator but I think there were some cheap models with no front-end RF amp' or preselection tuning. The antenna was connected to the mixer which had some gain to off set the lack of an RF amp' stage. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA:Heathkit Variable voltage bench power supply | Equipment | |||
FA:Heathkit Variable voltage bench power supply | Equipment | |||
FA:Heathkit Variable voltage bench power supply | Equipment | |||
FS: old radio parts, coils, variable caps, toroids, Loral disk capassortment, GC-Stackpole resistor assortment | Boatanchors | |||
Variable stub | Antenna |