| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ruud Poeze" wrote in message ... And that is the whole point. At this end of the ocean the DRM consortium people really believe in a replacement of analogue AM broadcasting to digital within "a couple of years". AM to FM took almost 40 years, and AM is still on, the advantages to FM over AM are more spectacular than DRM over AM in a world where also FM is available and the most popular band. Actualy DRM is ruining the AM band and I dont like the idea of one broadcasting band with 2 incompatable modulation systems. DRM only causes a lot of noise on your receiver and is already irritating the audience. ruud Digital modulation might fit within the same channel bandwidth as an analog channel, but it's obvious to anyone who listens that it has much more interference potential. Analog modulation normally puts only a small percentage of power at the ends of it's allowed bandwidth, and that power is intermittant. Digital modulation puts as much power at the ends of it's spectrum as anywhere else, and the noise is continous. Glenn Hauser has been reading reports from DXers blasting DRM. Among the most prominent of these DXers is Ralph Brandi. Frank Dresser |