From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

But the Question was:
"What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' ?"

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

How many times are you going to ask me the same question?

Do you think I'll answer any differently?


There is some kind of poetic satisfaction in watching that interchange!

LOL!




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

In article ,
"Michael" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Tony Meloche wrote:

dxAce© wrote:

Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message

Can you give us some examples of the weak signal stations
you receive on the R-75 with ECSS? What kind of antenna do
you use for these DX stations?

Thanks


DX'ing weak signals have just as much to do with "conditions"
as they do with the power and distance of the transmitted
signal. It may be very easy to get say...RNZI from my
location during times of the day and year when conditions are
good for it, and impossible to pick it up during other times.

I've used ECSS to identify weak carriers too but I was
wondering what you would consider a good DX catch. What have
you heard lately that you would classify as weak DX, given all
the "conditions"

Half of what I listen to is dx, including hams from around the
world. If you need a single example, I'll say .. How about right
now.... 21:50 UTC on 7.190 .... I'm listening to what I think is
Tunisia. Currently Arabic music. The signal is barely s-3 and it
is quite noisy. The same exact signal is also being broadcast on
7225. Still a bit noisy with fade out, but it makes it all the
way up to s-7.

I'd call this DX, but not a VERY weak one. It is far away, and
it is messy. The drill here on this signal is to use all the
tools at my disposal to clean it up and see how good I can get it
to sound... IE: ecss, filters, gain, nb, nr... etc.....

About S8 here on both frequencies.

Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B


To be fair, though, Steve - that probably has as much or more to do
with your antenna farm (I've seen the pics and read your description
- it's terrific) as it does your reciever.

Steve does have good antennas but the Drake R8B is very sensitive. One
thing about different manufactures is their attitude toward
specifications. Some rate their product more conservatively than
others. Just something to keep in mind perusing the specifications
between different manufactures of radio equipment.


I don't think the difference between him picking it up on 7225 as s-8 and me
picking it up as s-7 is enough of a difference to base it on his receiver
being more sensitive. It is hardly any difference at all. If I checked
the meter ten seconds later, mine might have been at s-6 or s-9 the way it
was coming in and out.

The Drake R8B and Icom R-75 have about the same sensitivity so I don't
think that is the difference.

One real question here... And one that I'm interested in.... Why would I
get it on 7190 at only s-3 while he gets it as s-8 ??? We're both getting
it about the same strength on 7225, so why should we be getting such a
measurable difference on 7190 ??? I'd say it probably has more to do with
the peculiarity of our locations in respect to the transmitter and what ever
comes between them rather then our receivers.

The signal in question is from the other side of the world compared to
the difference in distance between the two of you is small so location
is not likely the answer.

Lots of other possibilities here.

The sensitivity numbers for the receivers are general numbers. The
actual sensitivity changes with frequency because the front end of the
radio is not completely flat. Could be your R-75 has a bigger reflection
at 7190 but this is not the likely reason either.

Most likely the antenna itself or whatever you have for matching it to
the coax is the reason. Your antenna system most likely has a poorer
response at 7190 compared to Steve's system.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

But the Question was:
"What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' ?"

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

How many times are you going to ask me the same question?

Do you think I'll answer any differently?


There is some kind of poetic satisfaction in watching that interchange!

LOL!

Disclaimer: The above comment was posted by an individual who lied about
having a PhD.

In article ,
(RHF) wrote:

dxAce wrote in message
...
RHF wrote:

= = = dxAce wrote in message
= = = ...
Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt wrote:

Icom R75 with all the Kiwa mods, including the complete attenuation
removal
is roughly equal to Drake R8B in both SW AND MW performance.

True or false?

False.

I have used both radios and have found the R8B to be superior in all
respects.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B
"I swear by, not at, Drake receivers"©

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

DX Ace [N8KDV],

Having 'said' your Say.

What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' the
Drake R8B or the Icom IC-R75 for a Shortwave Listener (SWL)
moving up from a 'portable' AM/FM/Shortwave Radio to a Desk
Top LW/MW/Shortwave Receiver.

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

One or the 'other' Only Please ~ RHF

Why the R8B of course. If one is going to move up, then by all means move
up in
style.

DX Ace,

Style is Good.
-&-
Technically Better is Good.

But the Question was:
"What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' ?"

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

One or the 'other' Only Please ~ RHF

That's easy. The Drake is the best value for me because it works out of
the box. I like playing with antennas but I don't want to work on my
radio and I do not consider the performance of the R-75 good enough out
of the box.

Styling on the great audio from my R8B.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
dxAce(C) wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

But the Question was:
"What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' ?"

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

How many times are you going to ask me the same question?

Do you think I'll answer any differently?


There is some kind of poetic satisfaction in watching that interchange!

LOL!

Disclaimer: The above comment was posted by an individual who lied about
having a PhD.

Not to mention the fabrication of owing any SW radios.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce(C) wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

But the Question was:
"What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' ?"

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

How many times are you going to ask me the same question?

Do you think I'll answer any differently?


There is some kind of poetic satisfaction in watching that interchange!

LOL!

Disclaimer: The above comment was posted by an individual who lied about
having a PhD.

Not to mention the fabrication of owing any SW radios.

And even if he did, would he listen to them? I seem to recall him complaining
about the time I spend listening to mine so I'm not so sure he's really
interested in shortwave, or whether he just likes hanging out here.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

In article ,
dxAce(C) wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
dxAce(C) wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

But the Question was:
"What would you say was the 'Best Value for the Money' ?"

[ ] Drake R8B

[ ] Icom IC-R75 (R-75) with Kiwa Mods.

How many times are you going to ask me the same question?

Do you think I'll answer any differently?


There is some kind of poetic satisfaction in watching that interchange!

LOL!

Disclaimer: The above comment was posted by an individual who lied about
having a PhD.

Not to mention the fabrication of owing any SW radios.

And even if he did, would he listen to them? I seem to recall him complaining
about the time I spend listening to mine so I'm not so sure he's really
interested in shortwave, or whether he just likes hanging out here.

The only two things Mikey knows about are being nasty and Trolling. He
has complained about you spending to much time listening to SW and has
belittled some of your reception reports clearly show he does not care
about the hobby. The radios listed in his BS signature means nothing as
does the BS logs he stole or made up in the now distant past.

His only other talent is starting off topic threads with news URL's like
any of us could not find them if we wanted.

Now that is in Mikey's words "is truly pathetic."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Michael" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Tony Meloche wrote:

dxAce© wrote:

Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message

Can you give us some examples of the weak signal stations
you receive on the R-75 with ECSS? What kind of antenna do
you use for these DX stations?

Thanks


DX'ing weak signals have just as much to do with
"conditions"
as they do with the power and distance of the transmitted
signal. It may be very easy to get say...RNZI from my
location during times of the day and year when conditions
are
good for it, and impossible to pick it up during other
times.

I've used ECSS to identify weak carriers too but I was
wondering what you would consider a good DX catch. What have
you heard lately that you would classify as weak DX, given all
the "conditions"

Half of what I listen to is dx, including hams from around the
world. If you need a single example, I'll say .. How about
right
now.... 21:50 UTC on 7.190 .... I'm listening to what I think is
Tunisia. Currently Arabic music. The signal is barely s-3 and
it
is quite noisy. The same exact signal is also being broadcast
on
7225. Still a bit noisy with fade out, but it makes it all the
way up to s-7.

I'd call this DX, but not a VERY weak one. It is far away, and
it is messy. The drill here on this signal is to use all the
tools at my disposal to clean it up and see how good I can get
it
to sound... IE: ecss, filters, gain, nb, nr... etc.....

About S8 here on both frequencies.

Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B


To be fair, though, Steve - that probably has as much or more to do
with your antenna farm (I've seen the pics and read your description
- it's terrific) as it does your reciever.

Steve does have good antennas but the Drake R8B is very sensitive. One
thing about different manufactures is their attitude toward
specifications. Some rate their product more conservatively than
others. Just something to keep in mind perusing the specifications
between different manufactures of radio equipment.


I don't think the difference between him picking it up on 7225 as s-8
and me
picking it up as s-7 is enough of a difference to base it on his
receiver
being more sensitive. It is hardly any difference at all. If I
checked
the meter ten seconds later, mine might have been at s-6 or s-9 the way
it
was coming in and out.

The Drake R8B and Icom R-75 have about the same sensitivity so I don't
think that is the difference.

One real question here... And one that I'm interested in.... Why would
I
get it on 7190 at only s-3 while he gets it as s-8 ??? We're both
getting
it about the same strength on 7225, so why should we be getting such a
measurable difference on 7190 ??? I'd say it probably has more to do
with
the peculiarity of our locations in respect to the transmitter and what
ever
comes between them rather then our receivers.

The signal in question is from the other side of the world compared to
the difference in distance between the two of you is small so location
is not likely the answer.

Lots of other possibilities here.

The sensitivity numbers for the receivers are general numbers. The
actual sensitivity changes with frequency because the front end of the
radio is not completely flat. Could be your R-75 has a bigger reflection
at 7190 but this is not the likely reason either.

Most likely the antenna itself or whatever you have for matching it to
the coax is the reason. Your antenna system most likely has a poorer
response at 7190 compared to Steve's system.


I tried both my dipole and my 200 ft roof wire on both signals and both of
my antennas received the signal on 7190 substantially weaker then that on
7225. I bet if you set Steve's antenna and receiver up here at that time,
you'd get the same difference in the two signals. I don't think it is the
antenna or the receiver. Something else is going on. I know both Steve and
I are in North America, but, we are far enough away (NJ vs. MI) to have our
locations effect how we receive the signal. For all I know, the 7190 signal
comes out of a different antenna set up that just happens to be favorable to
Steve's direction. I think that is where the real study is here. To find
out what difference if any that there is between the two signals. Are they
coming from two different antennas ???

Michael

Michael wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Michael" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Tony Meloche wrote:

dxAce© wrote:

Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message

Can you give us some examples of the weak signal stations
you receive on the R-75 with ECSS? What kind of antenna do
you use for these DX stations?

Thanks


DX'ing weak signals have just as much to do with
"conditions"
as they do with the power and distance of the transmitted
signal. It may be very easy to get say...RNZI from my
location during times of the day and year when conditions
are
good for it, and impossible to pick it up during other
times.

I've used ECSS to identify weak carriers too but I was
wondering what you would consider a good DX catch. What have
you heard lately that you would classify as weak DX, given all
the "conditions"

Half of what I listen to is dx, including hams from around the
world. If you need a single example, I'll say .. How about
right
now.... 21:50 UTC on 7.190 .... I'm listening to what I think is
Tunisia. Currently Arabic music. The signal is barely s-3 and
it
is quite noisy. The same exact signal is also being broadcast
on
7225. Still a bit noisy with fade out, but it makes it all the
way up to s-7.

I'd call this DX, but not a VERY weak one. It is far away, and
it is messy. The drill here on this signal is to use all the
tools at my disposal to clean it up and see how good I can get
it
to sound... IE: ecss, filters, gain, nb, nr... etc.....

About S8 here on both frequencies.

Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B


To be fair, though, Steve - that probably has as much or more to do
with your antenna farm (I've seen the pics and read your description
- it's terrific) as it does your reciever.

Steve does have good antennas but the Drake R8B is very sensitive. One
thing about different manufactures is their attitude toward
specifications. Some rate their product more conservatively than
others. Just something to keep in mind perusing the specifications
between different manufactures of radio equipment.


I don't think the difference between him picking it up on 7225 as s-8
and me
picking it up as s-7 is enough of a difference to base it on his
receiver
being more sensitive. It is hardly any difference at all. If I
checked
the meter ten seconds later, mine might have been at s-6 or s-9 the way
it
was coming in and out.

The Drake R8B and Icom R-75 have about the same sensitivity so I don't
think that is the difference.

One real question here... And one that I'm interested in.... Why would
I
get it on 7190 at only s-3 while he gets it as s-8 ??? We're both
getting
it about the same strength on 7225, so why should we be getting such a
measurable difference on 7190 ??? I'd say it probably has more to do
with
the peculiarity of our locations in respect to the transmitter and what
ever
comes between them rather then our receivers.

The signal in question is from the other side of the world compared to
the difference in distance between the two of you is small so location
is not likely the answer.

Lots of other possibilities here.

The sensitivity numbers for the receivers are general numbers. The
actual sensitivity changes with frequency because the front end of the
radio is not completely flat. Could be your R-75 has a bigger reflection
at 7190 but this is not the likely reason either.

Most likely the antenna itself or whatever you have for matching it to
the coax is the reason. Your antenna system most likely has a poorer
response at 7190 compared to Steve's system.


I tried both my dipole and my 200 ft roof wire on both signals and both of
my antennas received the signal on 7190 substantially weaker then that on
7225. I bet if you set Steve's antenna and receiver up here at that time,
you'd get the same difference in the two signals. I don't think it is the
antenna or the receiver. Something else is going on. I know both Steve and
I are in North America, but, we are far enough away (NJ vs. MI) to have our
locations effect how we receive the signal. For all I know, the 7190 signal
comes out of a different antenna set up that just happens to be favorable to
Steve's direction. I think that is where the real study is here. To find
out what difference if any that there is between the two signals. Are they
coming from two different antennas ???

7190 is directed to North Africa and 7225 is directed to Europe.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

"dxAce©" wrote in message
...


Michael wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Michael" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in
message

...
In article ,
Tony Meloche wrote:

dxAce© wrote:

Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:

"starman" wrote in message

Can you give us some examples of the weak signal
stations
you receive on the R-75 with ECSS? What kind of
antenna do
you use for these DX stations?

Thanks


DX'ing weak signals have just as much to do with
"conditions"
as they do with the power and distance of the
transmitted
signal. It may be very easy to get say...RNZI from my
location during times of the day and year when
conditions
are
good for it, and impossible to pick it up during other
times.

I've used ECSS to identify weak carriers too but I was
wondering what you would consider a good DX catch. What
have
you heard lately that you would classify as weak DX, given
all
the "conditions"

Half of what I listen to is dx, including hams from around
the
world. If you need a single example, I'll say .. How about
right
now.... 21:50 UTC on 7.190 .... I'm listening to what I
think is
Tunisia. Currently Arabic music. The signal is barely s-3
and
it
is quite noisy. The same exact signal is also being
broadcast
on
7225. Still a bit noisy with fade out, but it makes it all
the
way up to s-7.

I'd call this DX, but not a VERY weak one. It is far away,
and
it is messy. The drill here on this signal is to use all the
tools at my disposal to clean it up and see how good I can
get
it
to sound... IE: ecss, filters, gain, nb, nr... etc.....

About S8 here on both frequencies.

Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B


To be fair, though, Steve - that probably has as much or more to
do
with your antenna farm (I've seen the pics and read your
description
- it's terrific) as it does your reciever.

Steve does have good antennas but the Drake R8B is very sensitive.
One
thing about different manufactures is their attitude toward
specifications. Some rate their product more conservatively than
others. Just something to keep in mind perusing the specifications
between different manufactures of radio equipment.


I don't think the difference between him picking it up on 7225 as
s-8
and me
picking it up as s-7 is enough of a difference to base it on his
receiver
being more sensitive. It is hardly any difference at all. If I
checked
the meter ten seconds later, mine might have been at s-6 or s-9 the
way
it
was coming in and out.

The Drake R8B and Icom R-75 have about the same sensitivity so I don't
think that is the difference.

One real question here... And one that I'm interested in.... Why
would
I
get it on 7190 at only s-3 while he gets it as s-8 ??? We're both
getting
it about the same strength on 7225, so why should we be getting such
a
measurable difference on 7190 ??? I'd say it probably has more to
do
with
the peculiarity of our locations in respect to the transmitter and
what
ever
comes between them rather then our receivers.

The signal in question is from the other side of the world compared to
the difference in distance between the two of you is small so location
is not likely the answer.

Lots of other possibilities here.

The sensitivity numbers for the receivers are general numbers. The
actual sensitivity changes with frequency because the front end of the
radio is not completely flat. Could be your R-75 has a bigger
reflection
at 7190 but this is not the likely reason either.

Most likely the antenna itself or whatever you have for matching it to
the coax is the reason. Your antenna system most likely has a poorer
response at 7190 compared to Steve's system.


I tried both my dipole and my 200 ft roof wire on both signals and both
of
my antennas received the signal on 7190 substantially weaker then that
on
7225. I bet if you set Steve's antenna and receiver up here at that
time,
you'd get the same difference in the two signals. I don't think it is
the
antenna or the receiver. Something else is going on. I know both Steve
and
I are in North America, but, we are far enough away (NJ vs. MI) to have
our
locations effect how we receive the signal. For all I know, the 7190
signal
comes out of a different antenna set up that just happens to be
favorable to
Steve's direction. I think that is where the real study is here. To
find
out what difference if any that there is between the two signals. Are
they
coming from two different antennas ???

7190 is directed to North Africa and 7225 is directed to Europe.


The explanation is probably there... The one on 7190 for one reason or
another probably works out to be less favorable to my location that to
yours. I'm going to check it out again tommorow at the same time.

Michael