In article telamon_spamshield-2E4E5A.21154401062004
@news.sf.sbcglobal.net, lid
says...
You know with all the OT threads he has started I think he is the worst
Troll to ever hit the news group. His employer (if he has one) should
get a load of what he does here.

I am sure he has surpassed any other past entity as the most disruptive.
I mean that between the sock puppets and number of daily OT threads he
is the worst ever.

He has been a lot of fun but maybe it is time we all put him in the kill
file. What do you think?

I think we, as a group, should just kill file him off at some point. I
mention this because unless we all agree do it things will not change
much.

I will stop responding to him and his sock puppets if the rest of the
group will but if people still want to continue poking the Troll with
sharp sticks because it is just too much fun I'll do the same.

What do you all say?



Kill Steve, he's the troll! Mike doesn't post anywhere near what he
does, and it's about radios sometimes when he does! I cut him alot of
slack due to Steve's insane ravings.

BDK

BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-2E4E5A.21154401062004
@news.sf.sbcglobal.net, lid
says...
You know with all the OT threads he has started I think he is the worst
Troll to ever hit the news group. His employer (if he has one) should
get a load of what he does here.

I am sure he has surpassed any other past entity as the most disruptive.
I mean that between the sock puppets and number of daily OT threads he
is the worst ever.

He has been a lot of fun but maybe it is time we all put him in the kill
file. What do you think?

I think we, as a group, should just kill file him off at some point. I
mention this because unless we all agree do it things will not change
much.

I will stop responding to him and his sock puppets if the rest of the
group will but if people still want to continue poking the Troll with
sharp sticks because it is just too much fun I'll do the same.

What do you all say?



Kill Steve, he's the troll! Mike doesn't post anywhere near what he
does, and it's about radios sometimes when he does! I cut him alot of
slack due to Steve's insane ravings.

Bryant rarely posts about radio, or radios.

He only wishes he knew what one was for.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

In article ,
says...


BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-2E4E5A.21154401062004
@news.sf.sbcglobal.net, lid
says...
You know with all the OT threads he has started I think he is the worst
Troll to ever hit the news group. His employer (if he has one) should
get a load of what he does here.

I am sure he has surpassed any other past entity as the most disruptive.
I mean that between the sock puppets and number of daily OT threads he
is the worst ever.

He has been a lot of fun but maybe it is time we all put him in the kill
file. What do you think?

I think we, as a group, should just kill file him off at some point. I
mention this because unless we all agree do it things will not change
much.

I will stop responding to him and his sock puppets if the rest of the
group will but if people still want to continue poking the Troll with
sharp sticks because it is just too much fun I'll do the same.

What do you all say?



Kill Steve, he's the troll! Mike doesn't post anywhere near what he
does, and it's about radios sometimes when he does! I cut him alot of
slack due to Steve's insane ravings.

Bryant rarely posts about radio, or radios.

He only wishes he knew what one was for.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm





Most of his posts aren't about radio any more, most are just bouncebacks
to your cheetos nonsense, etc. Like I said, I cut him some slack due to
your bombardment of insults at him.

BDK

BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-2E4E5A.21154401062004
@news.sf.sbcglobal.net, lid
says...
You know with all the OT threads he has started I think he is the
worst


Keep it radio please, its common courtesy. This is newsgroup to discuss and
communicate about shortwave radio. I have no idea what the previous thread
is about, seems to be a private and pointless waste of time and I am sadly
having to block senders.

Thank you.

Mike

In article ,
"Mike Terry" wrote:


BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-2E4E5A.21154401062004
@news.sf.sbcglobal.net, lid
says...
You know with all the OT threads he has started I think he is the
worst


Keep it radio please, its common courtesy. This is newsgroup to discuss and
communicate about shortwave radio. I have no idea what the previous thread
is about, seems to be a private and pointless waste of time and I am sadly
having to block senders.

I've head enough from the clueless one.

Plonk

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

From: "-=jd=-"

Looking at the volume of OT posts made by MWB, it would seem quite obvious
BDK has that backwards. Granted, you don't cut MWB any slack on any topic,
but unless BDK's news server is somehow filtering posts without his
knowledge, MWB leads in OT posts by a vast amount.

Now, I believe that if the truth were known, it's more a case of BDK's
disagreeing with you. There's nothing at all wrong with someone filtering
anyone for disagreeing with them (or whatever reason). But BDK's stated
reason appears most disingenuous and patently inconsistent with the
readily available posting history of MWB and yourself. In other words, I'm
left wondering why BDK felt the need to fabricate an unbelievable reason
when there was absolutely nothing wrong with his true reason(s).

Then again, "spin" seems to be irresistably popular among some...

This is simply fabricated bull****, JD. It hurts your credibility. What
percentage of posts do you believe Steve makes that are radio-related? Because
he beats me on posts by an almost 2-to-1 basis. Are you really suggesting that
almost 50 percent of Lare's posts are radio-related? On an average day Steve
may make two radio-related posts and 20 OT ones. Over 60% of my OT posts are
responding to his OT posts! But then we know that you're hardly a paragon of
objectivity, right?

I think it's more of a case of others disagreeing with YOU!




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "-=jd=-"

Looking at the volume of OT posts made by MWB, it would seem quite
obvious
BDK has that backwards. Granted, you don't cut MWB any slack on any
topic,
but unless BDK's news server is somehow filtering posts without his
knowledge, MWB leads in OT posts by a vast amount.

Now, I believe that if the truth were known, it's more a case of
BDK's
disagreeing with you. There's nothing at all wrong with someone
filtering
anyone for disagreeing with them (or whatever reason). But BDK's
stated
reason appears most disingenuous and patently inconsistent with
the
readily available posting history of MWB and yourself. In other
words, I'm
left wondering why BDK felt the need to fabricate an unbelievable
reason
when there was absolutely nothing wrong with his true reason(s).

Then again, "spin" seems to be irresistably popular among some...

This is simply fabricated bull****, JD. It hurts your credibility.
What
percentage of posts do you believe Steve makes that are
radio-related? Because
he beats me on posts by an almost 2-to-1 basis. Are you really
suggesting that
almost 50 percent of Lare's posts are radio-related? On an average
day Steve
may make two radio-related posts and 20 OT ones. Over 60% of my OT
posts are
responding to his OT posts! But then we know that you're hardly a
paragon of
objectivity, right?

I think it's more of a case of others disagreeing with YOU!


The issue is more one of "OT threads initiated," but I'm sure you
won't want to see it that way since it puts you in the worst possible
light.

And, please...questioning -jd's- credibility?

From: "T. Early"

The issue is more one of "OT threads initiated," but I'm sure you
won't want to see it that way since it puts you in the worst possible
light.

And, please...questioning -jd's- credibility?

So, Steve gets off the hook because his thousands of OT posts are simply
stalking-like responses to threads initiated by others?

Wow. There goes YOUR credibility...As if you ever had much...





Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael 'I couldn't make it in the real world so I stayed at school' Bryant
wrote:

From: "T. Early"

The issue is more one of "OT threads initiated," but I'm sure you
won't want to see it that way since it puts you in the worst possible
light.

And, please...questioning -jd's- credibility?

So, Steve gets off the hook because his thousands of OT posts are simply
stalking-like responses to threads initiated by others?

Stalking? You haven't called your fat assed lawyer relatives yet?

Drop those Cheeto's and hit the phone, Fat Boy!

Wow. There goes YOUR credibility...As if you ever had much...

You've had none for quite some time...

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

The issue is more one of "OT threads initiated," but I'm sure you
won't want to see it that way since it puts you in the worst
possible
light.

And, please...questioning -jd's- credibility?

So, Steve gets off the hook because his thousands of OT posts are
simply
stalking-like responses to threads initiated by others?

Wow. There goes YOUR credibility...As if you ever had much...


Well, I predicted that you wouldn't want to see it that way and you
didn't. That would appear to make me fairly credible.