http://tinyurl.com/3amog




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

http://tinyurl.com/3amog


Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the
leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Yes, it is against the law. And now that you've shown, contrary to
widely held belief, that you're capable of getting something right,
why don't you go for two and provide any support for your statement
that -he's- deeply involved in the leak.

BTW, refusing in the moment to speak with investigators until a lawyer
is present is commonly known as "lawyering up." Consulting with one
in anticipation of questioning isn't. Yet another attempt at an
inflammatory header that just comes off wrong.

MWB,

"That is against the law, right ?"

MWB - Are you not inviting a rejoinder
from DX Ace by making this statement?

Something to Think About ~ RHF
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

MWB,

More Liberal LIES and DISTORTIONS from the Left.
[ You are becoming Oh So Predictable... Oh So Tiresome ! ]

The 'actual' Headline of this News Article was:

"Bush Finds a Lawyer to Use 'if' Called in C.I.A. Leak Case"

- by ERIC LICHTBLAU and DAVID E. SANGER
- The New York Times: June 3, 2004
NOTE: If Off-Topic then use "(OT) -" at the start of the Subject
Line.

NYT= http://tinyurl.com/3amog
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/03/politics/03leak.html?ex=1086840000&en=2f841bdb63230b24&ei=5 062&partner=GOOGLE

* President George "W" Bush has met with a private lawyer whom
he intends to hire to represent him "IF" he is questioned as part
of a Grand Jury investigation into the public disclosure of a C.I.A.
undercover officer's identity, the White House said Wednesday.

* "The President has had discussions with Mr. Sharp, and in the
event he would need his advice, the President would likely retain
him," Mr. McClellan said in a telephone interview.

* "The President has stated on numerous occasions that he wants
the White House to fully cooperate, and that would include himself,"
he added. "He wants the investigation to come to a successful
conclusion."

MWB - So Now it is Clear that you are a Member in Good Standing
of the "IH*3" Political Cadre.
1. I Hate - Bush !
2. I Hate - Americans !
3. I Hate - America !

MWB - Did you forget that John 'ff' Kerry is a Lawyer )

MWB - You may think that your are an AGENT of the 'truth'.
But, your 'slanting' of News and Information simply makes you
a Biased Liberal and a self-identified Leftist "Political Cadre".

MWB - Did You Actually Read the NYT Article that you posted ?
[ More Importantly Did You in-fact Comprehend what you Read ? ]

MWB - You remain the Senior Political Cadre of the OWLES in this
NewsGroup.

MWB - Once Again -Nice try at Liberal Lies and Leftist Distortion
(Slanting) of the Truth.

MWB - You Want the Truth - You Can't Handle the Truth ~ RHF
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...

http://tinyurl.com/3amog

Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)
..

In article , ocom says...

From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?

It will be interesting to see if the administration is more
successful in finding out who told Chalibis that we'd cracked
Iran's codes, than they were in discovering who outed the
CIA agent's identity.

FW

"T. Early" wrote in message
...

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the
leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Yes, it is against the law. And now that you've shown, contrary to
widely held belief, that you're capable of getting something right,
why don't you go for two and provide any support for your statement
that -he's- deeply involved in the leak.

BTW, refusing in the moment to speak with investigators until a lawyer
is present is commonly known as "lawyering up." Consulting with one
in anticipation of questioning isn't. Yet another attempt at an
inflammatory header that just comes off wrong.

Bryant never lets facts get in the way of his rants.

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu 03 Jun 2004 12:19:59a, ocom (Michael Bryant)
wrote
in message :

From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the
leaking
of that CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law,
right?


You must have some information everyone else doesn't.
How deeply is he involved and how do you know this?
Or is this just your opinion?


Be prepared for the famous MWB 180-degree slam dunk in which you will
now be asked to show Bush is -not- deeply involved.

"T. Early" wrote ...

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Sounds like GWB might better call Komrade Klinton and get David Kendall's number.