Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patrick Turner wrote in message ...
Syl's Old Radioz wrote: "Jon Noring" a écrit dans le message ...high-performance, tube-based AM (MW/BCB) I'm very interested in building such a tuner to match with audiophile-grade tube amplifiers and pre-amplifiers ... Audiophile AM is an oxymoron... Syl Now there's talk of digital broadcast, and the phasing out of FM and AM broadcasting. But I don't expect it to dissappear soon, and even more channels for people's attention seem to spring up daily to consume the leisure time of the masses, and TV gets the main share. Digital recievers need to be costed below the existing radio receiver costs before folks will buy them as an add on for their TV watching. People's expectations about home entertainment are far beyond just sitting down listening to music. Most AM is listened to in cars, if at all, but usually while folks are doing something else. There will always be broadcasting of some sort, because its possible, and the spectrum exists, but the programme quality decline continues. As fewer listeners tune in, there are less advertisers willing to pay the stations, and its not worthwhile building a super dooper radio to listen to them. I have 3 HRO receivers in parts from which I plan to get two good ones, I have several other radio projects to do, but alas no time, since I have to work for a living. I'd like to try using a 2 MHz IF strip for my A radio, because at least there 3 stations here worth listening to out of the total of 7. I figure the 2 MHz IF frequency would allow a Q of 50 for each LC circuit, and thus the BW would be 40 kHz for each, so with 4 or 6 consecutive LC circuits the BW could be 20 kHz, thus allowing 10 kHz of audio BW. Perhaps single tuned IF coils are all that's needed. The single tuned high Q IF auto tranny is pretty awful at 455 kHz, as used in transistor based circuits because with a Q of 100, the BW is only 4.55 kHz, and with two such coils you have only say 3.6 kHz, so only 1.8 kHz of audio can pass, and many transistor radios have only 1.8 kHz of audio BW. Some tube types only have that much. I have measured plenty of impressive looking tube sets with RF stages, and the total number of tuned circuits is about 6 including 4 IF coils, and the bandwidth narrows down badly. Communications radios sometimes used lower IF at say 100 kHz to take advantage of the lower bandwidth for a given Q. This allowed very good selectivity for short wave, but was hopeless for local station AM. Its possible that by removing many turns off existing 455 kHz IFTs, the 2MHz could be achieved. The oscilator would operate at the BCB frequencies + 2 MHZ. So the oscillator coils and circuit would need revision, but then that'd be easy, since the coils do not differ much from the usual low end short wave types. The other way of doing an AM radio today is to use totally digital techniques for converting what is coming from the antenna and pull out the audio from any wanted station in ways which nobody in 1935 could ever have imagined. I think this would be an interesting digital project for someone. Everyone has a PC at home these days, and it sould be easy to use it to sift out a few radio waves. But if fidelity isn't transmitted, not even a PC can decide correctly what to substitute for missing audio HF. Just my 3c worth, Patrick Turner. I don't have 3c and I only have 2GB. WTF do I want to do that on this POS. Why does 'radio' have to be done on a computer? Get moving and build a dedicated device (radio) instead of using a damned computer. This should be in a sci. group. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA/FS: High Power Antenna Tuner | Equipment | |||
FA/FS: High Power Antenna Tuner | Equipment | |||
High school radio stations alive and well | Broadcasting | |||
KE9OA's High Performance MW Receiver | Shortwave | |||
High performance MW receiver | Shortwave |