LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old June 9th 04, 03:41 AM
Patrick Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Robert Casey wrote:




So, if I'm reading this correctly, the necessary bandwidth for standard AM
will be twice the audio bandwidth, which must be between a minimum audio
bandwidth of 4000 Hz and a maximum audio bandwidth of 10,000Hz.



Contrary to popular belief, AM stations broadcast with a bandwidth of
20KHz, which
makes for audio up to 10KHz. This much bandwidth in a tuner works well
for local stations,
but for DX work you'd want to cut your bandwidth in your receiver to
+-5KHz to avoid
excessive splatter. Even then, you'll still get some "monkey chatter"
from an adjacent channel
station. "Monkey chatter" is a technical term for the modulated audio
that came from station
A showing up "upside down" when you are listening to station B, 10KHz
away on the dial.
"Upside down" meaning that an audio tone of 9KHz station A transmitted
gets demodulated
by your radio when it's tuned to station B, as a 1Khz tone. 9.5Khz -
500Hz, and so on.
Human speach "inverted" this way sounds like "monkey chatter". The only
way to reduce
monkey chatter is to null out station A with the loop antenna. But if
there's another station C
10KHz on the other side of the desired station, and not in the same
direction of the first
undesired station, you're sunk.


What you are saying here is true about monkey chatter,
and "inversion" of music and speach.
But usually it only applies to distance listening.

And a sharp bridged T LC notch notch filter won't reduce the monkey
chatter, just the 9/10kHz whistle from carriers interfering.



You'll also want a sharp 10KHz notch filter (9Khz in Europe and
Australia and elsewhere).
That's to get rid of the heterodyne from the adjacent stations' carriers.

If you can find a copy of RDH4 (Radio Designer's Handbook edition 4), it has
lots of info on radio receiver design. But it assumes that you have a
working
knowledge of electrical engineering. That is, not a beginner's book.


Well said, the RDH4 isn't easy to read. But each sentence is never a waste of
words,
so you must consider each word you read.

Building radios the way they did in 1955 from nothing upwards using a few tubes
takes a lot of effort, and the main thing apart from knowledge that makes 95% of
ppl
abandon projects is the building of coils and the discipline about
constructional quality.

Patrick Turner.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA/FS: High Power Antenna Tuner Peter Dougherty Equipment 0 December 20th 04 05:43 AM
FA/FS: High Power Antenna Tuner Peter Dougherty Equipment 0 December 20th 04 05:43 AM
High school radio stations alive and well Mike Terry Broadcasting 4 May 25th 04 03:55 PM
KE9OA's High Performance MW Receiver Diverd4777 Shortwave 1 October 17th 03 06:15 AM
High performance MW receiver Pete KE9OA Shortwave 99 September 26th 03 03:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017