In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:

Syl's Old Radioz wrote:

"Patrick Turner" a écrit dans le message

I don't expect anyone to pay 3c for what I say, which could be
seen as OT.

You just met our village idiot it seems...

There is an unspoken rule here..._Ignore_ his posts. Let him talk
to himself.

We don't get into fight with village idiot like you do on
RAT...Keeps rar+p "clean"...;o)

Syl

Well, with all due respects to all gentlemen and possible idiots on
all groups to whom this subject thread is cross posted to, I reserve
the right to decide who I will ignore or not.

I will desperately try not step on anyone's toes as I act in well
intentioned freewill.

I won't budge from the idea that its possible to digitise the signal
from the antenna and simply apply suitable algorithms, and get
digital decoding, without all the phase shift caused by consecutive
tuned circuits.


Chill dude. There is nothing wrong with this idea and the current
technology can do it. The problem is money. It would be expensive to do
this and I would not expect people to pay the price when it would be a
small improvement over the current generation of radios. Heck, I would
not expect people to pay the price for a large improvement.

Digital techniques do not end all distortion and add there own type of
noise by the way.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California