Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Telamon wrote: In article , Jeffrey D Angus wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Jeffrey D Angus wrote: Telamon wrote: I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes think as you do. I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting. I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not? Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to know. This is it guys I'm not asking again. Can we have that in writing? 'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot. You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it. What a bozo. You posted to a public forum. As a matter of fact, you CROSS posted the three groups, including the one I normally read. RAR+P. Yeah. Since you and the other bozos started cross posting I don't know which group you post from or read. Sure I could subscribe to the other groups and figure it out but why bother. You did not address your posting to anyone in particular, other than the people in RAT and RAR+P. Yeah I did. I responded to you idiot. You must smoke up a large cloud before posting. However, you specifically asked if "we" were going to stop. The answer is no. I told you I'm through asking you to stop bozo. Got a reading comprehension problem. The simple fact is that nobody really gives a damn what you think. Your disregard for anyone else's desire noted. Nobody gives a damn about you either. Although this is a public forum I doubt anyone cares what you think either. Flame all you want. Thanks for your permission. If I had found the Trolling spoke person for rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes it would have saved some time. What took you so long. Oh well water over the dam and all that. So what use does a pot smoking idiot with reading comprehension problems have for tubes, phono's or antiques anyway? I think a person of your caliber would have no use for any of it other than sniffing the varnish or glue used to restore the stuff. Amen. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill wrote: Telamon wrote: This is it guys I'm not asking again. WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest. Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR? All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all three groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the denizens of each one. Rgds, Bill |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Bill
wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Bill wrote: Telamon wrote: This is it guys I'm not asking again. WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest. Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR? All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all three groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the denizens of each one. We all have our limitations Bill. I'm doing my best to endear myself to the fine people cross posting from rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes. Sure hope I've made a good impression with them. You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it? I don't know why these threads don't get cross posted to several other dozen newsgroups that have radio in the title. I think the amateur groups would benefit from these threads. Those people are interested in BS and radio design after all. Seems like a good fit to me. Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave since the Bryant hiatus. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill wrote: You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it? Yes, http://www.sparkbench.com Most of the sets have tubes and SW so its "on topic" for this crossposting. :-) Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave since the Bryant hiatus. Don't worry unless you have a Llloyd and Bryant hiatus at the same time. -BM |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Dan wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon wrote: In article , Jon Noring wrote: I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including rec.radio.shortwave. Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop. I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think the same way you do. I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find. Heck, post it again! |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Telamon can't help it - he's bucking to be the next Fuhrer! "Post this! Don't
post that! Don't disagree with me otherwise you are a troll!". I would just bet that he does a wonderful goose-step while trying to re-write FAQ's. Keep on posting, guys! It's all part of the hobby. Regards John Barnard Jeffrey D Angus wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Jeffrey D Angus wrote: Telamon wrote: I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes think as you do. I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting. I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not? Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to know. This is it guys I'm not asking again. Can we have that in writing? 'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot. You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it. What a bozo. You posted to a public forum. As a matter of fact, you CROSS posted the three groups, including the one I normally read. RAR+P. You did not address your posting to anyone in particular, other than the people in RAT and RAR+P. However, you specifically asked if "we" were going to stop. The answer is no. The simple fact is that nobody really gives a damn what you think. Flame all you want. Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." Tara Morice as Fran, from the movie "Strictly Ballroom" |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon wrote: In article , Jon Noring wrote: I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including rec.radio.shortwave. Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop. I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think the same way you do. I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find. Heck, post it again! Some people just don't know how to play nice. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Telamon wrote in message ...
In article , dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon wrote: In article , Jon Noring wrote: I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including rec.radio.shortwave. Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop. I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think the same way you do. I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find. Heck, post it again! Some people just don't know how to play nice. You couldn't have said it better it yourself. Most of the sex groups are in alt. Go jerk off in that corner. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Telamon wrote in message ...
In article , dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon wrote: In article , Jon Noring wrote: I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including rec.radio.shortwave. Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop. I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think the same way you do. I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find. Heck, post it again! Some people just don't know how to play nice. You couldn't have said it better it yourself. Most of the sex groups are in alt. Go jerk off in that corner. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |