Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Snip

The discussion has everything to do with listening to the BCB,
and radio theory.

If you would spend time reading the group you would see the several
cross posted threads don't mesh well with rec.radio.shortwave. The group
is generally about listening to SW, BCB and sometimes long wave. There
is discussions about radios specifications, antennas and receiving
challenges. Other topics revolve around the programming or hearing
pirates and the like. Yes the group goes off topic a lot on what people
listen to on short wave.

There is no good reason to cross post these threads to three groups.

I think you are outnumbered.

Talks on BCB receiver designs cannot be bad for all three groups IMHO.



Don't cross post unless there is a good reason to do so is a good
general rule to follow.

Some think there *is* a good reason.



Three threads were cross posted at nearly the same time from
rec.antiques.radio+phono, rec.audio.tubes. If I don't speak up why
should I expect it to stop?

Just be happy you ain't got all these nitwits raving on about
politics, terrorists, etc, ad nausem.

Patrick Turner.



--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Snip

The discussion has everything to do with listening to the BCB,
and radio theory.

If you would spend time reading the group you would see the several
cross posted threads don't mesh well with rec.radio.shortwave. The group
is generally about listening to SW, BCB and sometimes long wave. There
is discussions about radios specifications, antennas and receiving
challenges. Other topics revolve around the programming or hearing
pirates and the like. Yes the group goes off topic a lot on what people
listen to on short wave.

There is no good reason to cross post these threads to three groups.

I think you are outnumbered.

Talks on BCB receiver designs cannot be bad for all three groups IMHO.

I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Snip

The discussion has everything to do with listening to the BCB,
and radio theory.

If you would spend time reading the group you would see the several
cross posted threads don't mesh well with rec.radio.shortwave. The group
is generally about listening to SW, BCB and sometimes long wave. There
is discussions about radios specifications, antennas and receiving
challenges. Other topics revolve around the programming or hearing
pirates and the like. Yes the group goes off topic a lot on what people
listen to on short wave.

There is no good reason to cross post these threads to three groups.

I think you are outnumbered.

Talks on BCB receiver designs cannot be bad for all three groups IMHO.

I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

I hear your request but you are the only one to complain about what
many including myself is a trivial issue.

I for one don't think it is impolite to talk about radio construction
on a radio listeners disscussion group.

There are plenty of opinions I don't ask for, but which get hurled in my
direction
and as long as they are not downright insulting, obscene,
verbally violent, I tolerate them every day without complaint.
There are episodes of grossly OT threads, and the occasional spot of humour,
and that adds colour, even real weather to dull days of serious chit chat.

You are invited to consider a more tolerant position, and rather than complain
about the noisy party,
come over and join in!

Patrick Turner.



--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.

In article , Bill
wrote:

Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.

Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill
wrote:


Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.


Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?


All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all three
groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the denizens
of each one.

Rgds,
Bill

In article , Bill
wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill
wrote:


Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.


Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?


All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all
three groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the
denizens of each one.

We all have our limitations Bill.

I'm doing my best to endear myself to the fine people cross posting from
rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes.

Sure hope I've made a good impression with them.

You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it?

I don't know why these threads don't get cross posted to several other
dozen newsgroups that have radio in the title. I think the amateur
groups would benefit from these threads. Those people are interested in
BS and radio design after all. Seems like a good fit to me.

Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave
since the Bryant hiatus.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:
I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.

Jeff

--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
Tara Morice as Fran, from the movie "Strictly Ballroom"

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:
I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.

You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it.

What a bozo.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article
,
Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:
I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.

You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it.

What a bozo.

Oh yeah I forgot to ask you what you smoke before you post jerk.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California